the1gofer

Here are some photos I took of the show. You can see all of the photos I took at My Flickr Page As time goes on I will be posting some of the good ones on My PhotoBlog. Leave a comment and let me know what you think.

Well if you take a look at the recap you will see ALL of the scores fall into the same position. I think it has more to do with a judging philosophy that makes it difficult for corps to change position this late in the season. I would agree with you if some scores were in the top 5 and the guard was really low, but that simply isn't the case, all of the scores besides color guard are around 8th or 9th place.

Here are a couple I took that I like. I really like their uniforms. The hometown favorite. You can see all of my favorites at my photoblog or all of my photos, including the ones that didn't turn out so well my flickr page.

Despite the rain, which threatened to end the show, all groups performed well. In my opinion, and apparently NOT the judges, the highlights of the show were as follows. In order of my memory, Madison Scouts, Carolina Crown, Phantom Regiment, and The Cavaliers. The Scout's show started off strong and remained very exciting throughout. While not completely innovative or new it was reminiscent of other popular shows of the past. Their execution was near flawless, and the performers seem totally confident with their roles. *disclaimer, I am not a scouts fan* In my opinion they were saverly underscored. They should have been in the top 5 at least. It seemed that many in the crowed agreed with me because once the score was announced a loud round of booing in sued. I am disappointed in what seems to have become the now routeen misplacement of corps. Its still unclear why the judges placed them so low, but it's apparent the scouts must not be in favor with the power that be in DCI. Performers and staff alike should be aware, and I am sure they are, that their real score is much higher despite what some "unbiased" *said with a great deal of sarcasm and disdain* judges may say. I have never seen Carolina in person before, and they were quite a treat to see. Their show had a pleasant theme, and they told their story well. I was immedatly struck by their musical talent, even more than their drill. Musicly speaking they were one of the more talented groups on the field. While they had their moments of "high fast and loud" they were not over come by them. They demonstrated alot of artistry that the critics of drum corps would be surprised to hear. Phantom, as usual, was very good. They have allot of fans in Arizona, and like myself, I think many of us wish they would make it here more often. I was again struck, not surprisingly, by their musical performance more than drill. It wasn't, however, the most exciting show, in my opinion. Finally, the Cavaliers. Obviously the group who should, and did, take home the gold. Their show tended to a appeal more of the High fast and loud crowd, but their execution was near flawless. This brings me to my last two issues with the show. First, didn't DCI publish that the show order would be random sometime last year or the year before? With the exception of two corps switching place, the performance order was exactly the same as the score order. This leads me to two possible conclusions, either the judges are too stupid to see past the order and judge the corps based on what they see, or the order isn't random at all. As a spectator, I would like to see the corps mixed up, and be able to judge for myself who I think the winner is going to be, not just sit in the stands, have the corps paraded in front of me, and have an obligatory, and meaningless award ceremony at the end of the show. That brings me to my second issue. Why have the drum majors line up in the order of the score? That defeats the whole purpose of the ceremony. As an audience member I want to be surprised when I find out who gets first. Their should be some tension before they announce second and we realize who gets the gold. It almost appeared as if the officials that ran the show wanted to get it over with as soon as possible because we were running so late. I would like to remind those officials and DCI that we the audience members, payed for tickets to the show, and just gave them ALOT of money, to be entertained. They should keep that in mind and entertain us to the END of the show. All that said, I still enjoyed the show! If anyone is interested I took alot of pictures of the show. You can find them at My Flickr Page

Can any thread in this forum stay on topic? I do realize the irony that this question is also off topic.

I made a couple of collages from drum corps photos. Let me know what you think. http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/37800605/ and http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/37800648/

I think it forces the designers to be more creative with how they use the football field. When was the last time a DI corps used back drops, or reposioned the pit?

Did the renegades organize the symposium, or did they just participate?

thanks!

Does anyone have contact information for the River City Regement? Thier site seems to be down and none of the email address I have found seem to work. PM if you have it.

Who wants to come to phoenix, AZ??

Is it always the same place?

Has the location for 2007 DCA finals been anounced yet?

Does anyone else seem to think their is a judging bias centered around number or members? And if not a bias, then a preffernce?

I never said your account wasn't accurate, I said you don't know what is happening now. None of us can live in the past, only the present. Presently the organization is undergoing changes that will hopefully change things for the better. You were not and are not in a position to see all of those things. Only time will reveal wither or not those things have the impact we hope. Again, I'm not saying your wrong. I don't agree with your interpretation of those experiences. Judging the entire organization by the first two camps is like judging War and Piece by the first two pages. It can't accurately be done. I believe your view of the events and the organizations is slightly skewed, that's all. I know I'm not completely unbiased either. I think I have a more complete picture. But the topic seems to have changed from what I had in mind when I started. I only wanted to address the rumors that were circulating about our first two competitions. That I have done, but now it seems to have changed into something else entirely. Those who are concerned with D3 or Jester have become polarized around this topic and we have begun debating the legitimacy of our organization. We will continue to do what we are doing so long as we keep improving, after all we are teachers first. Legitimacy is something for DCI to decide and doesn’t seem to be up for debate in the forum of public opinion. I appreciate everyone’s support and I appreciate other's lack their of. Let me share one final story that has influenced the way I look at the activity, and perhaps it will help you all understand where I am coming from. Between the end of last season and the beginning this season I was discouraged about our scores in competition. As a result of my discouragement I was debating wither or not I would continue any involvement whatsoever in the activity. So I began to express my frustration to a colleague who asked me one simple question. "Why do you judge the success or failure of an entire season based on the opinion of a few judges?" I didn't have an answer. He then told me to define my personal success and define what success for the organization. If I met that and the organization met that, why then should I be discouraged? He was rite, of course, I realized that my self-worth and the value of the organization aren’t determined by those select few individuals who are called judges, or by the many individuals who share their opinion in forms such as these. My success and our success are determined simply. Are the students getting better? I know they are, as do many of you, so I know we are becoming successful. I stated before that the competition should be a byproduct of the educational experience not the product, and I firmly hold that conviction. Having realized how the discussion has changed from making a statement of fact to a debate on the validity of our organization I will leave this topic.