rpbobcat

I'm a Civil not a Structural Engineer or mechanical engineer. So I don't know exactly. A lot would depend on who designed the prop. There's also no guarantee that, if an engineer reviews a design he'll be able to "sign off " on it. Best approach would be to have an engineer do the design in the first place. I would think that, if a corps works with a professional company that makes props, they would have people "in house" to handle/certify the design.

I've posted on this topic before. I'm an engineer and ,when it comes to props ,some of the things I've seen in DCI, scares the crap out of me. 1. Just for the sake of liability ,I would think that a prop's design should be certified by a Licensed Professional Engineer, Architect etc. 2.Again, if for no other reason then liability, I would think a corps would have one or more "qualified" individuals inspecting each time a prop is assembled and/or dismantled. 3.There should also be a signed maintenance log kept for each prop ,each time it is assembled/disassembled documenting its condition ,including any damage and repairs with dates and specifics as to that repair. Maybe this comes off as "over kill" till someone gets hurt.

The situation with SCV was a lot different. If I read correctly, their issues had to do with the state compliance, including their BINGO operation. The Cadets are dealing with both financial and legal issues. If the stories about The Cadets liquidating assets are true, they are in a dire financial situation. Living in North Jersey, I know a number of Cadets alumni. They all say the same thing about the Cadets selling off pretty much everything. From the Board Chair's October 16,2023 "Message" I anticipated some type of "follow up". But, to date, nothing. I would think if The Cadets planned on coming back, they'd be doing some type fund raising, including for the Maroon and Gold Club. I've been a member of the Maroon and Gold Club going back to the early 80's but haven't heard a word from the organization. The on going litigation just makes things worse. The "Cadets Are Being Sued . . . " thread provides a pretty good analysis of the legal problems the organization faces. I would love to see The Cadets back on the field. Just doesn't seem like, even if it can happen ,it won't be anytime soon.

I'll try. Right now the state of the art synthetic turf system I use is Field Turf "CORE". The technical definition of it is "multi-layer, dual -polymer fiber" (mono filament). Its the next generation of synthetic turf. Many synthetic turf fields, including ,it is my understanding ,LOS , are some type of "Slit Film" system. A lot of players attribute "Slit Film" to injuries, including "non contact". Met Life switched to "CORE" this season. The players say its a big improvement over the "Slit Film ". As far as synthetic turf projects not being finished on time, that's the norm, not the exception. I tell my clients to build plenty of "what if " time when they are planning on having a project ready by a certain date.

DCI Finals start 8/08/24. If my math is correct, that's 46 calendar days to remove the temporary pools, stands, etc. Then repair any damage to the LOS concrete floor, that may occur during pool construction and or removal. Then install and test the new synthetic turf. That's tight at best. I also wonder what LOS's contract says for a "drop dead" date for the contractor. Somehow, I think the NFL Season, not DCI Finals is the priority. As others have posted, DCI better have a plan, just in case.

I know that, "he whose name will not be mentioned" said, on several occasions, his goal was to eliminate any guard apparatus that had a military " tie-in".

I'd go a step further. I'm sure every corps has legal representation. In addition to what you suggest, I would like to see any allegation, of any type of direct abuse, be reviewed by the corps' legal council and he makes the call whether law enforcement should be contacted.

"Not making a livable wage " doesn't really say much. According to the posts on this thread, this is a side gig for a lot of teachers. No issues with that. I just want to know how (per hour, lump sum contract , etc. ) these people are being paid and how much corps are paying them for a Summer Job ?

Read my post. I never said they were all full timers. I said " I presumed they were all getting paid". Full time or not, they are all getting paid. Questions to me are : 1. Why do you need that big a percussion staff ? 2.How much is each staff member being paid ?

22 member percussion staff. For a corps that's already had "issues". I presume they are all getting paid ? And people wonder why people say corps spending in "out of control".

A couple of questions: 1. Where can you find DCI's 990's ? 2.Do the 990's "itemize" the sources for $14 M revenues ?

Hate to be stupid, but what is an E.E. ?

As I've posted, I do a lot of Expert Testimony in Civil and Criminal Cases. In my experience , even requesting a dismissal is a ways off. I wouldn't think a judge would consider it at least until there are Interrogatories and depositions. A settlement is always possible. But, if the point of the lawsuit is not primarily financial, but to bring light to the issue, plaintiffs may not want to settle. If that's the case DCI & SoA could, depending on specifics of the case, "Summary Judgement ". But a lot of judges out here in NJ can be hesitant to grant it.

Ways other then send money ? Send lots of money.

I know that the Ohio University Marching 110 (240 MM actually, long story) are less then 20% Music Majors.