As long as there are no clearly defined and universally applied performance metrics that are used at least as a baseline to apply a score to a caption , the process remains highly subjective and leaves the final scoring solely to the discretion of individual judges. what criteria a judge uses to determine a a tenth of a point difference between corps in a given caption is a mystery to me. The only reality is that judges have to develop some tool to use. Corps are not adjudicated based on their performance but rather on their performance relative to the other corps they compete with. Call it banding slotting or whatever you want but as long as they adopt the philosophy of scores being a art form not a science , corps cannot be indifferent to various judges opinion. What determines the final scores of the contest is much more a factor of a how a judge applies there highly subjective and discretionary value to a performance..I believe judges are well aware of how a corps has been scored in their caption , and you will not see any radical changes to the progression of that score. Everyone knows that in the finals the winning score will be 98 or 99 and it will be one of the current top 5 corps. The season itself is judged on a scale that gets a corp starting at 70 or so and ending at 99. After about a week you can figure out who the top 3 or 4 corps it will get the 99... So given this and the variability of judges and no judging accountability ( no performance metrics) a corp can do all the "cleaning or changing" they wont but the effort eill far exceed the return in terms of raising a score.