ced3905 Posted August 17, 2009 Share Posted August 17, 2009 Abstain, I cee both sides to this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OTGFP951 Posted August 18, 2009 Share Posted August 18, 2009 NO! I don't think that "number crunchers" should be faulted for being proactive and prepared. I understand this is a fantasy league but if the professor gave you the answers to the test and you still got an "F" its your fault for not studying. That's how i feel on the issue. And number crunching is not a guarantee of a championship and If I recall correctly Finals were generated scores in last off season anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gcurrier Posted August 18, 2009 Share Posted August 18, 2009 And number crunching is not a guarantee of a championship This is for sure...I always do well but never win World in an off season in any league so clearly I am not THAT good at it! LOL Until now there have been basically two masters at it here... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarOrg Posted August 18, 2009 Share Posted August 18, 2009 The only way that could happen is if they tried to predict what the final cap would be and select captions from there. Well no surprises that's how camp 1 does it. I am going to vote Nay although originally I liked the idea and I am in camp 1 but I agree with Gary. We need to do something for off-seasons but we need more discussion on what and putting a solid plan together. Currently just putting numbers in a spreadsheet and predetermining position 1, 2, 3....etc... not to exciting to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skylinersop16 Posted August 18, 2009 Share Posted August 18, 2009 No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jedihunter80 Posted August 18, 2009 Share Posted August 18, 2009 I am hearing both arguments and it seems to be a draw. CODCE abstains Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig III Posted August 18, 2009 Share Posted August 18, 2009 Though this would be an interesting change, I vote no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mello123 Posted August 20, 2009 Share Posted August 20, 2009 Blue Wave abstains. Sometimes i will do some number crunches and other times im just looking to get the most bang for my buck with the captions i have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ccollins792 Posted August 20, 2009 Share Posted August 20, 2009 Yes As a number cruncher this could be a negative for me but I like the challenge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr fabulous Posted August 20, 2009 Share Posted August 20, 2009 Si Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts