Jump to content

Staff Merry-go-round 2018 Edition


Recommended Posts

On 9/9/2017 at 4:15 PM, Cappybara said:

You take everything about the Cadets on the most personal level possible 

Darn tootin'.

If anyone casts shade on BD whatever the veracity of the statement, you are all over it as if your tag-a-longitis is in jeopardy.:bluedevil:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Ghost said:

How sweet of them.

image1-160x300.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jonwoody said:

Hey Stu... A little off topic still aren't we?? Chillax already. We get how much you hate certain people and things. Let's move on  and stay on topic please.

 

1 hour ago, Stu said:

The new program director for the Academy has been seen with cool spiked pink tinted hair. On topic and very very very interesting.

 

8 minutes ago, Liahona said:

image1-160x300.jpg

Well there she is!!!! Again, on topic and very very very interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, flammaster said:

So was it an error that Wunderlich is the new brass arranger and not pit?  or is he stepping up to a new position? 

Would be a pretty elaborate typo to have conveniently screwed up both that AND the actual front ensemble arranger. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Stu said:

Yes, stand up and be Men of Honor by stating publicaly they did not get a chance to read it prior to it going public and that they did not agree to the content; but once they supported it after the release they owned it just as much as the author. However, that is not what I am going after here. As you said, Let's be clear; please show 'factual' information that they in fact did not know the content prior to the release of the document. Again, the mode of trust but verify is in play here.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jeff Ream said:

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Typing laughter is a way to deflect a real response. Where is the factual let's be clear proof that the six became caught off guard backed agaist the wall gutless spineless co-conspirators who publically supported something they did not read?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, xandandl said:

Darn tootin'.

If anyone casts shade on BD whatever the veracity of the statement, you are all over it as if your tag-a-longitis is in jeopardy.:bluedevil:

I think we all defend our favorite corps to a certain extent. Regardless of what some grown ups did does that mean you should wish a whole organization to fail? I think that's incredibly petty and ridiculous. So no, its not FUN to wish disappointment and failure on 150 kids who had nothing to do with some scandal and are just trying to do what they love. Feel free to think whatever you want about those involved.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...