Bluzes Posted July 17, 2018 Author Share Posted July 17, 2018 (edited) 37 minutes ago, queenanne_1536 said: I used to think there were politics in judging. I don't think that either. I do believe what we get as results from all the different individuals judging, different venues, varying weather conditions involved is bordering on a statistical impossibility to have such symmetric agreement. If I had access to tools I had at work one could develop a study and put a percentage on probability of agreement over peer segments. Sure didn't experience such peer agreement anywhere I worked and don't think many of you have either. Edited July 18, 2018 by Bluzes typo 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCEP00 Posted July 17, 2018 Share Posted July 17, 2018 Skimmed "Borg Collective" and expected Cavies 2006. Disappointed. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjoakes Posted July 17, 2018 Share Posted July 17, 2018 I have no idea what this thread is about. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mello Dude Posted July 17, 2018 Share Posted July 17, 2018 (edited) 58 minutes ago, Bluzes said: I don't think that either. I do believe what we get as results from all the different individuals judging, different venues, varying weather conditions involved is bordering on an statistical impossibility to have such symmetric agreement. If I had access to tools I had at work one could develop a study and put a percentage on probability of agreement over peer segments. Sure didn't experience such peer agreement anywhere I worked and don't think many of you have either. I think this is what the OP was getting at. Perhaps he should of used the term "collusion". LOL Edited July 18, 2018 by Mello Dude sentence structure 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PamahoNow Posted July 18, 2018 Share Posted July 18, 2018 12 minutes ago, Mello Dude said: I think this is what the OP getting at. Perhaps he should of used the term "collusion". LOL That was the OP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluzes Posted July 18, 2018 Author Share Posted July 18, 2018 (edited) 31 minutes ago, PamahoNow said: Hand this man some comma Give me all you have still won't know where they go but am looking forward to being judged this season. Thanks but I am a dead horse with grammar and such but it's never held me back. Edited July 18, 2018 by Bluzes typo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrownBariDad Posted July 18, 2018 Share Posted July 18, 2018 27 minutes ago, karuna said: Well it’s what I had in mind when I posted the pic so you’re going all psychic-friends-network if ii actually meant something else. Is that REALLY what you had in mind? Or, did you just think you thought of it? Sorry -- just finished watching "Inception". ;-) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PamahoNow Posted July 18, 2018 Share Posted July 18, 2018 Just now, Bluzes said: Give me all you have still won't know where they go but am looking forward to being judged this season. Tthanks but I am a dead horse with grammar and such but it's never held me back. Just try to use sentences with less than 8 words. Stick in a period. Then start a new sentence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim K Posted July 18, 2018 Share Posted July 18, 2018 3 hours ago, Hook'emCavies said: Well, I think The Cavaliers win every year... :) lol And I still think the judges were blind in 1979 when Phantom lost to Blue Devils and in 1980, 27th was robbed. So 38, 39 years from now you'll be even more convinced Cavies should have won every year. For Cavies, 79 and 80 were the "Santa Esmerelda" years, a great opener which is classic old school now but innovative at the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IllianaLancerContra Posted July 18, 2018 Share Posted July 18, 2018 2 minutes ago, Tim K said: And I still think the judges were blind in 1979 when Phantom lost to Blue Devils and in 1980, 27th was robbed. So 38, 39 years from now you'll be even more convinced Cavies should have won every year. For Cavies, 79 and 80 were the "Santa Esmerelda" years, a great opener which is classic old school now but innovative at the time. Cavies 80 was one of the most entertaining shows ever. The current young guard fans that shriek with every catch would be speechless watching the rifle line spin & juggle 2 rifles in different meters. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.