The way it was . You Bet. As far as a chance, why not, get better , follow criteria etc etc. we have seen corps jump from the bottom of finals to top 5 ( Boston ) one day to the next ,unlikely just as it was BITD or should have been. There was little reasoning as to why corps would jump or fall many many points, made no sense at all and was nothing more than a different judge and opinion, without reason other than " well I called it as I saw it" Not a good reason then or now.
From your other response about the tic and accountability. There was none until criteria was attached and even then for quite sometime judges ( some ) danced around the fact they were being questioned, I taught and judged under both abd the tic system was just as subjective as today but the difference is a judge must answer for his or her actions. Although a judge in captions is encouraged to judge independent of others they all follow said criteria and not off on their own.
I remember often back in the day ignoring some judges because we knew they wouldnt be judging at the end of the year or important shows and only to those we knew would. We worked off their sheets and opinions