The problem with scoring demand is that it's inclusion in the final score is obscure. The problem with defining demand is that there are too many categories of demand. My suggestion would be to have demand as a subcaption of every caption. So you can literally score the demand purely and execution purely then combine them. That way, also, neither of them could get anyone higher than a 50%. You need a good combination of both to win. Say for BD visual, They have a 15 in demand, but a perfect 20 in execution... well that would give them a 17.5. But if Cadets came in with a perfect 20 in visual demand (which can be defined... vis judges know what is hard and what isn't) but executed it like a pile of buttwhipe, then they could be literally awarded for their visual performance. (as opposed to an approximation thereof with an obscure "consideration" for demand)This may drop them to a really low score, like a 14, but their demand would still be there in a defined manner, bringing them to a 17. Yes, BD still won, but demand was not just thought about, but defined and added to the formula. This forces corps to push their members (which, isn't that one of the big purposes of this activity?) and not to take it past where their members can. Demand without performance gets a crappy reward, as does performance without demand. Also you can define demand much more effectively instead of evaluating it as a whole show. If they have hard music, but easy drill, then they get good music scores and bad vis scores. And as far as simultaneous marching and playing, that would be put in the playing demand. Because marching while playing sixteenth notes is a lot more likely to hurt the music than the drill. So the music captions can award the music while moving. And of course, they already did that for performance, because if you sound like crap while moving, then well... you sound like crap while moving.