actucker

Members
  • Content Count

    1,011
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

actucker last won the day on January 8 2016

actucker had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

679 Excellent

About actucker

  • Rank
    DCP Fanatic

Recent Profile Visitors

431 profile views
  1. For what its worth, without a field judge at finals week this summer, Bluecoats win the Sanford. Take that into consideration. Not saying its a good or a bad thing. Just an observation based on the recap.
  2. Here's your first word on the matter regarding what drum corps staffs (of which you have not been a part) do or don't do in an audition situation: "If drummers skills can only be evaluated in field competition, than every off season camp tryout would have every drummer evaluated by staff on a football field, and in movement while playing on the football field throughout the evaluation process." This is a straw man argument, so its irrelevant. Nobody said the only way to evaluate drumlines (which are different from percussion sections) is on the field in competition. You were the first to bring up a football field. "But most don't. Drummers are selected ( and rejected ) primarily in a standstill competition among other drummers for a spot in line." Sure sounds like you're saying exactly what I said you said. Here's a hint on how I know... I quoted you in my post! "So if staffers can make important decisions on which drummers are skilled better than other drummers from essentially a standstill, non marching environment, it most certainly calls into question that drummers abilities need to be seen in a marching environment on a football field. Most staffers don't even do this when they watch, and make assessments on the comparative abilities of drummers at camp tryouts.. If they don't see this as most critical in determining who can drum better, and make decisions on who gets a spot in the drumline and who does not, than neither do I ( nor anyone else)" Here's the part where you show your ignorance, since you don't seem to be able to grasp the difference between evaluating auditioning members and evaluating the 12 best drum lines in the world. Here's a tip. The majority of the auditioning members are not currently members of the top 12 battery sections in the world. Its a pretty big difference. You also try to put your ears in the same conversation as that of the best in the business. Its pretty slick for sure, but we all know better. "Again, my essential point however, hopefully not lost in all this, is that show design bleeds now into the percussion scores. Thats just my opinion. Nobody has to accept that opinion either. I make no demands that they do. its just a discussion thought, no more, no less. I think Cadets subpar show design pulled their drum scores down a bit, and into 5th place in Percussion. Can't prove it though, Can't be disproved either. So thats that, I guess." You're welcome to that opinion. Its just a sadly uninformed one that dismisses half of the conversation by your own admission. Maybe Cadets were better than a top 5 drum line, but since the caption isn't called drum line, but instead called percussion, your point isn't particularly well supported either.
  3. There you go again trying to argue against a point that hasn't been made. But you already know that. Keep on pushing that straw man. You're not fooling anyone. Meanwhile, I've been around plenty of drum corps auditions since its what I do for a living (teaching and writing for band and drum corps). Your assertion that drum corps staff's primarily evaluate members in a standstill situation is flat out incorrect. The Facebook posts from drum corps every November and December with members on the move are plenty of proof of that if you don't want to take my word for it. Also, as I explained to you, its much easier to separate kids at an audition, where the talent pool is significantly more diverse. When judging the members of the upper echelon of world class, the standards are much closer together, and every method of delineation matters. These kids have now been playing together for months. You're past the point of whether or not a kid is learning the technique you want him to learn, and on to whether or not the ensemble can produce at the highest level. Bottom line: you can't evaluate a percussion section purely via youtube.
  4. Really? How many drum corps percussion staffs have you been on? How do you know what the evaluation process is, or how members are being evaluated? I've never auditioned at, nor taught a drum corps that didn't evaluate their drummers on the move. I don't know of a single drum corps that doesn't either. At auditions, you're also dealing with a considerably wider range of talent. Its much easier to weed out the kids who don't have what it takes when you're not looking at groups entirely comprised of world class drum corps performers. None of this is to mention the complex and convoluted way we (as battery instructors) find to simulate the environment and coordination on the field. From tracking, to lot drill, to rehearsing in forms, we go out of our way to simulate the environment on the field. Why would we do that if it didn't make a huge difference? Also, now you're the one arguing against things that weren't said. Nobody is saying that the only way to evaluate drummers' abilities is on the move. We're simply saying that Youtube doesn't tell you enough to make that kind of determination.
  5. Not somewhat. Completely different. The difference has nothing to do with how it contributes to the show. That actually doesn't even appear on the sheet. As for your assessment of Crown vs the Cadets, that's your opinion. From what I saw this year, Cadets had issues executing on the move in some places, and Crown did not. This was far and away the best Crown drumline I've seen in quite some time. I wasn't there for championships week, so I don't know whether or not Crown was better through the week, but "laughable"? This is either hyperbole, or bias. One or the other.
  6. Nobody said that lot videos are the sole basis upon which to gauge drumlins, but you, in fact, did say: "my ears and eyes tell me that the Cadets had a far better drumline than " 5th " place from watching their line play on youtube. Also, for perspective, just a couple of years back, when the Bluecoats Show Design was not quite as good as this years, their Drumline ( still found there on youtube ) was WAYYY better than they were getting credit for. I personally do not think that this season's Bluecoats percussion line was as good as that of just 2 years ago. ( people here can youtube the 2 Bluecoat lines, and decide what they think as well)." Which says to me that you think YOU can tell from lot videos how good a drum line is. We can argue those merits all day long. With you being a brass guy, I'm going to say I'm pretty skeptical your ears are at that level, considering most drummers will tell you that Youtube lot videos are a dodgy way to evaluate without seeing it on the move. Are there things to be learned from those videos? Sure. I love watching them to see what lines are doing, see their progress from week to week in terms of development, etc. It tells me precisely nothing about how well they play in the actual show. All of that doesn't even mention the fact that that you can't find a lot of front ensemble videos on youtube, and since they are half the caption, that is a significant issue with that method of evaluation. That being said, the percussion judge isn't paying any attention to characters on the field, or drill design, or brass nuances. They are busy judging the percussion section they are seeing. There are plenty of things going on in modern percussion design that there's not a lot of time to sit back and notice any of the rest of the show design itself. This is particularly true of the field judges, who literally CAN'T judge show design, as they don't have a perspective for that. IF the show design has any bearing on the results (and that's a pretty big if), those effects are marginal at best. You may disagree with the results, and that's fine. But the judges are judging percussion, not show design.
  7. A hitter in batting practice is essentially doing the same thing as he does in a game. Nobody is ever going to ask him to swing a bat while he's running around the field. There is a big difference between playing well in the lot, and playing well on the move with listening environments, body responsibilities, the added physical effort etc.
  8. false pretenses of "proper mallet technique" Your words, not mine. I get your comparison to a "pandora's box", but that's not all that you said. There was nothing false about the motivation behind amplification of front ensemble equipment. If that's not what you meant, then you should word things more carefully. There was nothing wrong with my comprehension.
  9. Yeah, I'm going to stop you there. I generally stay out of this argument, but this one crosses a line. There is no false pretense behind the argument that proper mallet technique is more possible with amplification. Its a fact. You and I are not going to see eye to eye on a lot, and I'm not even going to get into the greater scope of electronics, but this is clearly a topic you know nothing about or you wouldn't make a sweeping accusation like that. You're just incorrect. There's nothing more to it.
  10. I'm not teaching at Bluecoats, so I don't know how they are approaching it, but that would seem like a reasonable way to handle it. My point was just that the idea of "everyone in the front ensemble listens back" is not particularly accurate for a lot of ensembles.
  11. Actually a lot of front ensembles start with a section timing first approach. Center deals with front to back. Everyone else follows the center, to the point of ignoring the backfield. Every ensemble obviously has their own method, but I can't remember the last front ensemble person I've worked with that didn't at least start with that method.
  12. As a guy who teaches a lot of drums, and thus deals with this concept a lot, its about calf strength, and the control of the motion between point and flex in the ankle. when you extend for the step, you point. As you pass through that footfall, you allow some flex to absorb the shock. Its not entirely different from most horn line's backwards technique, just in multiple directions.
  13. I haven't seen any numbers over the years to support that. Rankings all over the place, sure, but large spreads to prove a point? Not so much.
  14. Mathematically about the same, since the visual captions get the same weight as the percussion caption in terms of their portion of the overall score. The difference lies in the fact that the music sheets are so specialized. A great color guard will have a lot of effect on the visual analysis and visual ensemble sheets, whereas percussion has very little effect on the music analysis sheet and zero effect on the brass sheet (reference Crown's ability to win Music analysis consistently the last few years, with a 5th place or lower percussion program). A GE judge is also considerably less likely to notice great vs bad percussion (relatively of course, we're splitting hairs at that level) and allow it to affect his number. Essentially, guard and visual are more integrated into other sheets, and as such, have more pull on the overall result. That's why you're less likely to see a corps with a 5th or 6th place guard winning a championship. Its certainly possible, but much less likely.
  15. That criteria is covered on both the music analysis and the music GE sheets.