PhantomCav

The obvious difference being, of course, we don't live in those times. Cultures change. So does the measure of acceptable behavior. People were harder then, but so were times. I'm sure most of us born then would have adjusted opinions accordingly. But anyway, I've ruffled far more feathers than I ever intended to (believe it or not). Just was speaking my mind. Didn't mean to offend. I'd take it all down for the greater cause of peace and harmony, but I think with all the quoting going on, my posts would still be showing up in those of others. My sincerest apologies to anyone I've offended. Like I said, I never intended to talk down the Phantom Regiment itself or any of its members past or present. I don't think this DCP thing is really for me, so y'all take care.

No, actually I'm not. Just because you're continually drawing more out of my words than what I've actually said (due to over-sensitivity, perhaps?) doesn't make your perception the actual reality. If anything, I'm "promoting" criticism of some of the staff. You know, the paid professionals who have their jobs because kids are forking over thousands of dollars so they can march and compete? I don't think their methods should be off the table of discussion on a discussion board designed to discuss all things related to DCI. If they don't like it, perhaps the end result should be them doing some self-evaluation. But my guess is they don't give two ##### what a DCP poster says about them. That's their full prerogative. And the corps is much bigger than the staff. I've also been pretty clear about that. Where have I even hinted that I think someone should not go march Phantom Regiment if that's the corps they feel drawn to? I've iterated several times that my relative loved PR. They'd go back in a heartbeat if they actually could. But loving the corps and their overall experience doesn't remove one's ability to still have criticisms and grievances about particular areas, does it?

YES. Thank you. That sums up my feelings on all of this pretty concisely (something I'm not very good at!) And that 70s story is interesting. Thanks for sharing!

Thank you for all the strawmen. Maybe it would have helped if you'd actually read the entire thread before choosing to go on your tirade. G'day to you too.

I would guess the members who enjoy that type of coaching are the ones who don't bear the direct brunt of some of the more personal elements, but you may be right. And you may also be right about the effects of their unfiltered emotion. But they're also still working with kids, so there should always be certain levels of restraint, IMO. I personally believe that those restraints should include not totally berating a person's ability or intelligence openly in front of his/her peers. Criticism is fine. Even better in private. Humiliation? Not sure that ever really has a positive effect in such a setting, and it should take some pretty serious insubordination to merit even considering it. Again, just my personal opinion and philosophy.

That all seems pretty reasonable to me. I agree that there should ideally be a balance. The bosses should still be the bosses, and sometimes there are some real frustrating cases when you have that many youth together. Discipline should certainly exist and be enforced regularly and fairly. I just don't think it sounds like the Emmerts' versions of those "lightening bolts" you speak of are the best way to achieve their objectives. I could be wrong...they're the professionals in this field, after all. I'm most certainly not. I'm just a fan who has chatted some people up on the issue.

If you like Cavs 00 and 06, you might like parts of 04 and mayyybe 02-03. A lot of the ballads in that era for the Cavs have a similar sound to them (figures, as they have the same people writing/arranging them) But I guess if you've seen 00 and 06, you've probably seen those. If not.....*whispers* Google Videos is your friend when it comes to finding full show recordings from past years. */whispers*

Nope. But like I said, I'm related to a proud former member. They loved it. Absolutely loved it.....except for the way vis staff treated people occasionally. And the friends my relative made through the crops seem to feel the same way. Please don't mistake that for them not loving the corps and their time there. Like I also said, I know that's anecdotal and secondhand. But considering there are plenty on here who seem to have heard similar things and feel the same way, there must be at least a little fire behind the smoke. I'm glad that members from 08 don't seem to have had any such encounters. The incidents I've been told about happened in ensuing years, when Regiment struggled a bit more (relatively speaking, of course). And I certainly hope that every member has the time of their life no matter what the staff is like. But I just don't think that's grounds for letting them off the hook, either. So, no I didn't march. Yes, I know that means I'll never "know" like those who did. But I also want to be clear that I love PR and Cavaliers. They're different in pretty much every way, but I appreciate them both for what they put out on the field. And the members and former members I met through family and school have been pretty great people, too. I think they all deserve staff that respond accordingly. I can see that some former members of PR disagree with me, and they're obviously fully entitled to. I think we've reached "agree to disagree" territory.

Very nice, I'll have to give some of that a listen. I'll admit that the first time I ever saw the 1996 show, I thought it didn't seem like a 1st place show. But man, after seeing it a few more times and familiarizing myself with it, it's one of my all-time favorites. Admittedly, I wasn't all too familiar with a whole lot of Shostakovich before seeing A Defiant Heart, and I think that had a lot to do with my initial reaction. I've gladly remedied that problem as well.

Phil Jackson might not be cuddly, but he's pretty open about his philosophy. His approach is all mental and fairly passive outwardly. Granted, he's working with multimillionaire professionals. He took incense to Bulls practices in the Jordan era, for cripes' sake. That's almost taking to too far the other way, but hey, whatever. Of course, one could argue that instead dealing with kids, specifically ones who already have paid thousands of dollars in fees, some of which go to pay the staff, only further enhances that they deserve better treatment. Edit: And I understand Phantom's military heritage in that it came out of a VFW corps whereas the Cavaliers were a Boy Scout troop. But it isn't the military. At the end of the day, it's marching band. (Yes, I went there)

Bobby Knight also continually threw tantrums that reflected poorly on his program, his team, and himself. And he was fired from a job he had to try hard to lose (and almost fired at the next one). Maybe you're in the camp that think IU was wrong to terminate him, but I think most who aren't blind Hoosier faithful would disagree with you. Yeah, IU has 5 banners....from over 20 years ago. Taking the basketball coaching analogy further, do you think Phil Jackson coaches that way? Does Coach K or Roy Williams? Bill Self? I've seen K, Roy, and Self mad, but never anything like Knight. Point being, Knight's methods hardly justify themselves just in the name of winning.

I do understand why someone would march in PR. I'm related to someone who DID. And I went to high school under a director who marched several years with the Cavaliers. So I've heard plenty of talk/stories about both and how things went. Being treated like #### isn't one of the reasons my relative marched PR. And it hasn't been with any of the other PR members I've met as a result of that connection. Being pushed hard WAS a reason, along with loving PR's music tradition. I get that. But as I said, getting pushed hard and being treated like crap aren't inseparable by any means. And yeah, I am a fan of the "Rosemont way". My marching career began under a successful high school rendition of it, and my college band had a similar mentality. Are those the same as the actual system and in a summer of drum corps? No, of course not, but it certainly worked in those settings. And when the Cavaliers have fallen out of the top 3 ONE TIME in 13 seasons, I think it's safe to say it works for the Cavaliers too. Explain to me how it wouldn't work with Regiment while still preserving all of their great tradition and attitude. I freely admit my evidence is anecdotal, but it was pretty consistently so.

Yes, I read your post. And my post addressed your "gem." How that is getting "offensive," I'm not quite sure. Yes, the thread started about JD, then turned into JD and Paul. I understand that the original post about running rehearsals as professionals was referencing JD and Paul. I chose to use to post to make a comment running rehearsals as professionals involving other Regiment staff, which I don't find entirely unrelated. After all, running rehearsals professionally should apply to every member of the staff, not just JD and Paul. My apologies for not being more clear about whom I was referencing. And don't take any of my grievances as attacks on the corps or the kids. Those two things are great, phenomenal, top notch. The staff is not doing them the justice they deserve, in my opinion. And I think the post-Spartacus results speak for themselves in regards to how "effective" the current vis staff is with successfully implementing their methodology and philosophy over an extended period of time. It started quite well but isn't holding that trend well at all. Another topic hijack: I think Regiment is due for another run with black uniforms. Might help bump the visual scores for a bit, as well.

.....and? They still have a LONG way to go. And it doesn't justify them being that way in the first place. I'm not sure that's a part of Regiment heritage to be proud of. There's plenty of great heritage in the corps to go around without all of that. As has been pointed out in just this thread alone, you can work extremely hard and be pushed to your limit without all of that kind of crap being the driver.

Exactly. Nobody marching a drum corps has motivation issues. And G8 corps hardly have talent concerns. I understand the want to be driven hard. The people close to me from PR feel exactly that way about it. Doesn't excuse or justify the abrasive treatment, and they would be just as quick to tell you that. They love Regiment IN SPITE of the visual staff and their methods, not because of them.