Cavfan930

Yeah, the abstract has been going through some pretty serious revision, and doesn't necessarily reflect my actual thesis at this point. I just wanted to give people a general idea of what I'm doing. At first I wanted to explore those questions about the "point" of DCI. I decided pretty quick there wasn't enough to be said about that, and that the education drives the competition and competition drives the education.

I'm working on a research paper about DCI, specifically what the point of it all is. Here is an abstract (sorta) giving more details about the paper: The purpose of this paper is to discuss how the goals of Drum Corps International (DCI) and its member corps align with each other and with stated criteria of adjudication. Additionally, if these elements are not in harmony, then a discussion of the effects of that misalignment will take place. I will answer these two questions in order to demonstrate how these goals and criteria are aligned. What is the point of DCI, and does DCI exist for education or competition? The effects of this discussion are far-reaching, as throughout its history DCI has involved more than 7 million students and each summer, more than 400,000 fans attend live events. Preliminary research suggests that because DCI does not have clearly defined goals, the system of judging is always changing. It also suggests that without more emphasis on strong competition, the activity will continue to face challenges regarding its growth and sustainability. What I would love for someone to help me find is as many iterations of complete sheets as possible. I really need one from the tick days, plus 2-3 from 1995-present. Also, if anyone is or knows someone in the higher-level leadership of various corps (especially corps that have won in the past decade) who would be willing to communicate with me on these ideas, please PM me. Thanks guys!

Yeah talk about a mid-july slump.

Across the whole season and across all corps, I'd say it happens less than 3% of the time. But I'm not going to comb through all the recaps to find out.

I'm studying math/stats at college right now, and what's always bugged me about the system in DCI is the immense crossover between captions that are weighted differently. Last season, I kept a personal series of spreadsheets for my five favorite corps, with each competition they were in on the left hand column, and each caption/sub-caption across the top (like an expanded recap, but for only one corps across a full season). This is back with the GE Music and GE Visual (When I say it like that, it sounds so long ago). I figured, like many posting here have said, that as the shows cleaned musically and visually, the GE would rise accordingly. Because one of the GE captions was all about the effect of the music, how well the corps played their instruments ought to have a direct causal relationship with that caption. The same for visual. What I discovered was that, besides a general positive trend of y=x for the corps overall score, the plots relating the music and GE music looked totally different! About half the time you'd see decreases (small, but in the negative direction nonetheless) in the majority of the music sub-captions, but an increase in the ge music score. (On a similar note, it bugs me that you pretty much never see the achv surpass the cont/rep.) It was maddening to see, so I chose not to do that this year. Of course, they also changed the sheets this season anyways, so I can't really assert either way that the same would continue to exist. (Are GE 1 and GE 2 the same, or is one more considerate of music and one more for visual?) From a statistical analysis point of view, because there is an inherent relationship between all the captions but the GE is weighed more heavily than the scores it should be dependant on, absolutely no value can be placed in saying that X corps beat Y corps by less than 4 points (arbitrary number, it's probably not 4). Statistically, I would look at those scores, consider things like variance, standard deviation, etc. and be forced to conclude that the difference between them is not meaningful. In short, you end up with 5 champions instead of one when the normal conventions of stats and math are observed in considering the scores. Something else that bugs me is that at the regionals and throughout finals week, it is never the same panel every night. If you want to be able to say, as objectively as possible, that the scores from these events are meaningful representations of the corps ability to perform a show better than everyone else, then you've got to have the same panel in the same positions at each of the big contests. Although, if you really want to rigorously decide who's the best, then you've got to force each corps to perform exactly the same show, in the same uniform. That's really the only way to isolate a variable in this activity and then evaluate it. In conclusion, from an academic point of view, we would be better off if ALL the judges cast a simple vote for the best corps, and then do likewise for things like best percussion and brass. No more recaps filled with weird decimal points. Because honestly, how many times have you seen a corps clearly outperform someone else's brass, but then the recap says they only beat them by a tenth? It's ridiculous.

Then let's open up the school uniforms debate, shall we? Many proponents of school uniforms cite the massive psychological damage (or would you prefer the term abstract?) bullying, exclusion from social groups, and hazing as a reason to have standardized uniforms (which aren't generally very revealing). Or what about the abstract effects they have on people who sincerely believe that men and women shouldn't expose too much of their bodies in public?

I wonder if shortn'sour remembers the OP's very first comment that just because it's been done before doesn't mean it's okay? (2014, if you're wondering about the year)

Not in all countries, and as we've seen in America, drugs that used to be illegal can become legal.

Careful, the doublethink police, er I mean, fallacy watchdogs, are watching.

What is a drum corps show but a microcosm? A reflection of some piece of art, a time in history, or an idea? Is the whole thing not a symbol?

Hi, my name is Cavfan930 and I'll be your tour guide today. Here on the left, you see a sports competition being judged on what are ultimately subjective ideals of perfection. On the right, the internet forum most strongly associated with said activity. This forum exists entirely so fans of the sport can express their opinions, likes, and dislikes to people who share their same passion for the activity. We wish it could be entirely objective, but honestly, none of this would exist without someone's subjective opinion. And if you'll follow me down this way...

And pigs have nothing to do with communism, yet Animal Farm is okay. Metamorphing into a different kingdom/phyla isn't in the universe but Kafka's metamorphosis is a fine analogy/metaphor.

I agree with you whole-heartedly. But isn't part of what makes a character so convincing the ability of the actor or actress to find the character's qualities in themselves and amplify them?

Why do you think that the show design does not inadvertently condone sexualization? Not saying you're wrong, I'm just having a tough time seeing that side of the question.

At one point in history, yes. As the styles become more socially acceptable, designing and selling clothes like that becomes part of the norm. It's kind of a disturbing moment when you realize that prostitutes in 18th and 19th, and early 20th century would've been wearing more modest clothing than teenage girls today.