donincardona

yeah so? they need to be on the field with some eastern corps if they want to win the ring. and jeff you know that. c'mon man.

their big mistake was not coming east this year. they need a read from the east to get a decent seeding.

correct. and i think tear down worked better. just my opinion.

explain the 50 point scale to me. i missed that.

yeah , us rochester guy's are just real nasty..........buuaaahhhh

uummm may be. but i thought it was 81 when it got changed. but maybe after it was on TV about the scoring in 77 it got changed. 78 wa the new rules.

in the 70's it was a 105 point scale.

sorry for my absence but yes i was suspended for 5 days, for what i don't know . but i'm glad to be back kids. guess i'll just stay here on guess who and keep clean. at least here i don't get in trouble.

he posted to me here on this thread that he's going to dinner and then join me here. he will be here in all probability. we are on score patrol.

it's funny how we do a DCA show and get an 88 , then do a legion show and get an 83. then we would count out the extra 5 to see where we matched up in DCA. it was crazy stupid. like we were fooling ourselves.

you ar correct about the 105 perfect score. came about in 1970.

yup. that whole new way of doing GE. and what was it 30 points total. and how many GE judges was it? 6 ithink at DCA. you would remember better than me andy. you are the historian.

he's fine. just home licking his wounds.

no problem andy. like i said i should have used a fictional name. BTW i knew eric and i liked him a lot.

ok andy. i knew that would rankle you're feathers. i should have used fictional judges. my intent was not to say eric ever did that. it is what a lot of them did back them. eric , when he judged , was fair. but many were not. so please excuse me using him as a reference. does that help?

remember sky took 2nd at prelims and 5th at night. my jaw dropped. we moved up. i was happy about that. but i wanted to beat brigs. ya know the rivalry.

being enraged is one thing. being an idiot about it is another.

well let's go there. if eric perrilou was judging and sky's snare lie is not playing in unison and has phasing with in the lineor a sanare is out of sync for a second or just misses that's a tick.if it persists for 10 beats it's another tick. now it's sky. he had ties with them so sky didn't get ticked. on comes the cabs and he shreds them for every little thing. that's the simple criteria and the simple courruption and favoritism. this was a hypothetical event but it's how it went. and look no further that 1972 DCA. the worst most corrupt judging in my career.

we followed the rebels in atlanta. we were on the ready line. and when we did our show nobody knew we were there. nor did they care.

when i marched there was a defined criteria jeff. but there was so much corruption and favoritism it didn't seem like there was a criteria. like you said many times one mans tic was not a tic for another man. just being real here.

as the author of this thread, i'm asking the moderators to close this thread. it's getting ugly.

done with you. you have no tact. from now on i will ignore you.

i've been good this year haven't i?

did you even read his post to me chuck?