Onieal2007 Posted April 4, 2009 Share Posted April 4, 2009 I AGREE. I enjoyed them today Word on the street is James Logan got a penalty in prelims and without it they would have been in third. Can anyone confirm? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GEVisual Posted April 4, 2009 Share Posted April 4, 2009 Word on the street is James Logan got a penalty in prelims and without it they would have been in third. Can anyone confirm? I heard the same thing - that Logan would've been 3rd had it not been for a penalty. For what it's worth, I think the panel got the top 2 in the correct order. However, I would've had Flanagan closer to Avon and distanced from their neighbors below them as I felt they were clearly better than Carmel and Logan (vs. tenths away). Below that, I felt Carmel in 3rd was the right call, but could easily see Warren Central sneaking up to give them a real battle for the bronze. I personally didn't feel that Logan had an especially good run today, and find parts of their program a little hard to follow (especially the end which seems rather random). I actually thought they would be below Warren based on today's run, and again won't be suprised if Warren has a good run in finals and passes them. Below the top 5, Trumbull was a HUGE highlight for me. GREAT equipment skills by those girls and they had a wonderful run. I also enjoyed Seminole's performance - VERY musical in their interpretation and well performed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrfctTimeOfDay Posted April 4, 2009 Share Posted April 4, 2009 penalty is confirmed, I belileve it was .3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bevinator Posted April 4, 2009 Share Posted April 4, 2009 Mr. Boo mentions the penalty also in his write up. It was for a boundary violation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MIDPRONIUM Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 I certainly do miss Fred C. Beyer HS from Modesto, CA being in the top rankings of the Scholastic World class. I hope the color guard activity will not forget their classic, innovative shows that earned them Silver Medals in past WGI Championships. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amfgx Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 Since I'm such a big fan of groups like Stoneman and Northmont, anyone care to explain the scores? ESPECIALLY STONEMAN....With the placement of 22nd out of 24?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quegrawks Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 Since I'm such a big fan of groups like Stoneman and Northmont,anyone care to explain the scores? ESPECIALLY STONEMAN....With the placement of 22nd out of 24?! I understand being a fan...I'm a big fan of Stoneman Douglas, myself, but there was a lot not quite right with that show in terms of design, and the kids had a bad run at prelims. They're definitely going through some changes in that program, and I feel that it showed on the floor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amfgx Posted April 10, 2009 Share Posted April 10, 2009 I understand being a fan...I'm a big fan of Stoneman Douglas, myself, but there was a lot not quite right with that show in terms of design, and the kids had a bad run at prelims. They're definitely going through some changes in that program, and I feel that it showed on the floor. Oh definitely. But I am not shocked that they didn't make finals..But more of their final score.. Don't you think that a 74 is ridiculous? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Know it all Posted April 10, 2009 Share Posted April 10, 2009 Oh definitely. But I am not shocked that they didn't make finals..But more of their final score.. Don't you think that a 74 is ridiculous? Stoneman Douglas seems to be experiencing some growing pains as a result of the directorial changes that have taken place this year. They'll work it out, though. They have a historically strong program and they'll rebound. They just need a little bit of time to settle-in to their new surroundings. This type of thing is fairly common when a program goes through major changes. It's just a natural part of the process. I didn't see their prelim performance, but I guess they had a particularly rough run. Even so, 74 does seem to be a bit on the low side - especially when they scored a 77 two weeks earlier at the Tampa Regional. But it's water under the bridge, now. I actually kinda liked some of the stylistic choices that were made in their show this year. Initially, I wasn't sure how much I could get into a show about greed and money and all that stuff. But by the end of the season, the total package had some interesting touches in it that I rally appreciated. I definitely give them props for working their show right up 'till their final performance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tortillaGUARDIE123 Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 Since I'm such a big fan of groups like Stoneman and Northmont,anyone care to explain the scores? ESPECIALLY STONEMAN....With the placement of 22nd out of 24?! That made me wanna cry my eyes out. I thought they'd place higher than last year, but than not making finals at all?! GEEZ. :( Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.