PR ROCKS Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 (edited) To me, the tiers are a little bit more about "clumping," as well as where I'd expect the corps who haven't performed in a day or two to be scoring. This is much less mathmatically defined, but visually, when you look at the graphs, there are generally some clear gaps in the overal data.Here's how I'd seperate them, given my overall "feel" of the scores: I: Crown, Cadets, Blue Devils II: Vanguard, Cavaliers, Phantom, Bluecoats III: Crusaders, Blue Stars, Blue Knights, Glassmen IV: Troopers, Scouts, Spirit, Colts, Academy, Crossmen V: Mandarins, Pacific Crest, Surf, Pioneer I know at this point this is all in fun, but given the fact that in their only meeting Cadets and Cavies tied, and in their only meeting Crown beat Cavies by only .4 while they have now beaten Cadets by .8 and 1.3, how would you put Cadets in a higher tier than Cavies? I know you said given your overall feel - maybe that's what you are going on. I haven't seen anyone live so I tend to only go by score spreads between corps. Edited July 1, 2009 by PR ROCKS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris ncsu Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 I know at this point this is all in fun, but given the fact that in their only meeting Cadets and Cavies tied, and in their only meeting Crown beat Cavies by only .4 while they have now beaten Cadets by .8 and 1.3, how would you put Cadets in a higher tier than Cavies? I know you said given your overall feel - maybe that's what you are going on. I haven't seen anyone live so I tend to only go by score spreads between corps. :) Thus you have MY tiers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patblamo Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 I agree with what you have. But I really hope nobody puts any stock into it.Go back and look at what these tiers would've looked like last year at this time compared to the final result. 2008 BD, SCV Cavies, Cadets, Crown, Phantom Blu, BAC PC, BK, BS Gmen, Mandarins Spirit, Academy, Colts, Xmen Scouts, Troop, Pio Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keith Laubhan Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 I know at this point this is all in fun, but given the fact that in their only meeting Cadets and Cavies tied, and in their only meeting Crown beat Cavies by only .4 while they have now beaten Cadets by .8 and 1.3, how would you put Cadets in a higher tier than Cavies? I know you said given your overall feel - maybe that's what you are going on. I haven't seen anyone live so I tend to only go by score spreads between corps. Absolutely valid... All I'm basing it on is my interpretation of the line graphs. I'm looking at areas of relatively significant separation and the overall trajectory of each line. Overall, there are some pretty clear cables that have developed. There are some gray areas (Boston and Glassmen's recent jumps, for example), there's already a level of volatility (especially in the middle tiers), and I make no assumptions that those tiers that I've defined will hold true in even a week's time.... I do find it to be an interesting topic, though. Nobody knows how it all shake out, but it'll be fun to watch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_King Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 2008BD, SCV Cavies, Cadets, Crown, Phantom Blu, BAC PC, BK, BS Gmen, Mandarins Spirit, Academy, Colts, Xmen Scouts, Troop, Pio whats the different colors for? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkyRyder_FMM Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 whats the different colors for? Seems pretty obvious to me. Red are corps that dropped from their early season tier, and the green moved up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quinny Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 To me, the tiers are a little bit more about "clumping," as well as where I'd expect the corps who haven't performed in a day or two to be scoring. This is much less mathmatically defined, but visually, when you look at the graphs, there are generally some clear gaps in the overal data.Here's how I'd seperate them, given my overall "feel" of the scores: I: Crown, Cadets, Blue Devils II: Vanguard, Cavaliers, Phantom, Bluecoats III: Crusaders, Blue Stars, Blue Knights, Glassmen IV: Troopers, Scouts, Spirit, Colts, Academy, Crossmen V: Mandarins, Pacific Crest, Surf, Pioneer I agree Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pinwiz Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 (edited) If I were to divide the corps into tiers right now I'd use this: Championship: Crown, BD, Cadets Top 6: Cavies, SCV, Bluecoats, Phantom Finals: Boston, Blue Knights, Blue Stars, Glassmen Semis: Troopers, Madison, Spirit, Colts, Academy, Crossmen, PC, Mandarins Quarters: Surf, Pioneer, Cascades Edited July 1, 2009 by Pinwiz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soccerguy315 Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 If I were to divide the corps into tiers right now I'd use this:Championship: Crown, BD, Cadets Top 6: Cavies, SCV, Bluecoats, Phantom Finals: Boston, Blue Knights, Blue Stars, Glassmen Semis: Troopers, Madison, Spirit, Colts, Academy, Mandarins, PC Quarters: Surf, Pioneer, Cascades hopefully we don't lose Crossmen between now and August Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pinwiz Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 hopefully we don't lose Crossmen between now and August Fixed. Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.