Jump to content

Carolina Crown closers


Recommended Posts

Ok so I was watching the crown closer from 2009 and the last 40 seconds or less of that closer is the exact same (musically) as their 2010 closer. I was really confused when I noticed this lol. Was there a reason for that?? Was it because the crowd like it so much or something??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In 2010 their show was called "a second chance" which for some was a direct reference to their 2009 show where they almost won first but came in second. So if you consider that, the ending of 2010 was their second chance at winning so to speak and hence repeating the excerpt from 2009. But as we know it was the fifth chance that finally did it!

Edited by charlie1223
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A big part of the 2010 show was based around someone getting a second chance at love. At the end of the 2009 show, the Peter Pan character runs off of the field, leaving Tinkerbell behind. The 2010 show is supposed to be her trying to recapture that love, and leads to her being in an abusive relationship in the opener. The Marquez piece is the guard soloist searching for a new person to love, and the rush of new love. The Elgar is of course the romantic side of love. The re-statement of the Mahler is the return of her abusive former lover, and the decision that she makes. At first, she makes the wrong decision, which is why the corps rewinds. The second statement is the female character escaping from the bad relationship and choosing her new lover. And then of course The Promise of Living comes back in, and Peter Pan returns to rescue Tinkerbell from the dark, lonely world that he left her in. That's why it got brought back, to close the story arc. Pretty ingenious way to develop a two-year story arc for show design.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In 2010 their show was called "a second chance" which for some was a direct reference to their 2009 show where they almost won first but came in second. So if you consider that, the ending of 2010 was their second chance at winning so to speak and hence repeating the excerpt from 2009. But as we know it was the fifth chance that finally did it!

Ohhhhh ok that makes perfect sense. I'm not one to really remember shows names. Its way easier for me to refer to the year than the name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That late season closer add was a misfire, I preferred the one they had before it

Oh well

I’m getting annoyed with all the corps saving their ‘real closer’ for finals week

It’s so copy-cat in an 'artistic', supposedly 'innovative' medium that its almost seems self imposed mandatory which would imply a failure of the system

It was fine when occasionally some changed it but it’s out of hand, just love the last impression of the season being dirt

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'm getting annoyed with all the corps saving their 'real closer' for Finals week.

Have there really been many last-week changes of late? At least of anything more than small details? I think the only notable one last year was that Blue Knights cut their "no end" ending at Prelims.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...