Jeff Ream Posted July 13, 2014 Share Posted July 13, 2014 Which of your 15 questions you posed for us here are rhetorical in nature ( and thus, in no need of a response reply), and which of the 15 questions here are you actually seeking a response reply from us ? I'm still waiting for you to answer my questions Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRASSO Posted July 13, 2014 Share Posted July 13, 2014 I'm still waiting for you to answer my questions That makes two of us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff Ream Posted July 13, 2014 Share Posted July 13, 2014 That makes two of us. I did. you just don't like the answer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRASSO Posted July 13, 2014 Share Posted July 13, 2014 (edited) I did. you just don't like the answer. I don't even recall the specific question of mine you're referring to anymore, let alone your" answer", but... whatever. Edited July 13, 2014 by BRASSO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff Ream Posted July 13, 2014 Share Posted July 13, 2014 I don't even recall the specific question of mine you're referring to anymore, let alone your" answer", but... whatever. ah yes your classic answer. well played. At least you didn't edit the quote Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRASSO Posted July 13, 2014 Share Posted July 13, 2014 ah yes your classic answer. well played. At least you didn't edit the quote Thank you.. I'll take that as a compliment even as oblique as it may be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff Ream Posted July 14, 2014 Share Posted July 14, 2014 Thank you.. I'll take that as a compliment even as oblique as it may be. take it with cream and sugar if you want Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KirkAnthony Posted July 14, 2014 Share Posted July 14, 2014 (edited) Hooooly #### this site can be vicious. I don't see how pointing out two top corps represents a lack of creativity overall. Blue Devils, Crown, Bluecoats, Cavies, BAC, and even Phantom to a design extent are doing basically until-now never-before-seen things on the field. There's a wonderful balance of content this and every year. I think the argument should pretty much be over once some countless number of people have to keep reiterating the point that a well-designed show goes nowhere without the right performers. Maybe I'm in no place to comment on this, but I personally saw a huge dip in performance quality between Cavies 2011-2012. Also, returning members does not equal returning quality. BRASSO sure likes to restate their opinions in multiple separate posts a lot, don't they? Okay, I'm done. We should play nice! Everybody's opinion is valid so long as they aren't trying to present it as fact! Interpretation and such, blablabla... Edited July 14, 2014 by KirkAnthony 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipSopper Posted July 14, 2014 Share Posted July 14, 2014 Hooooly #### this site can be vicious. I don't see how pointing out two top corps represents a lack of creativity overall. Blue Devils, Crown, Bluecoats, Cavies, BAC, and even Phantom to a design extent are doing basically until-now never-before-seen things on the field. There's a wonderful balance of content this and every year. I think the argument should pretty much be over once some countless number of people have to keep reiterating the point that a well-designed show goes nowhere without the right performers. Maybe I'm in no place to comment on this, but I personally saw a huge dip in performance quality between Cavies 2011-2012. Also, returning members does not equal returning quality. BRASSO sure likes to restate their opinions in multiple separate posts a lot, don't they? Okay, I'm done. We should play nice! Everybody's opinion is valid so long as they aren't trying to present it as fact! Interpretation and such, blablabla... Honey, ...stick to uniform critique. Love yours'xo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HornTeacher Posted February 10, 2015 Share Posted February 10, 2015 the only time I could think of it affecting a judges call is if it's crammed in there for the sake of being crammed in there....i.e. not making any sense, just done to be done. Just re-reading this thread for the sake of enjoyment (?? Yes, this is a sick mind which resides here) and understanding. I also realized that this response by you was in response to one of my earlier posts...and I never responded. So to do you justice, I'll respond... If you're asking my view on the matter, my response (to your highlighted words) would simply be this: I would consider it pandering. Nothing more, and nothing less. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.