Should record scores be ranked numerically or by both corps and score?
19 members have voted
-
1. Which of the following is the correct listing of "Top DCI SCORES of All Time" (not "Top-Scoring DCI Corps Performances of All Time")?
-
1. 99.65 (2014 Blue Devils); 2t. 99.15 (2002 Cavaliers & 2005 Cadets); 4t. 99.05 ((2002 Cavaliers at Semis, 2009 Blue Devils)
-
1. 99.65 (2014 Blue Devils); 2. 99.15 (2002 Cavaliers & 2005 Cadets); 3. 99.05 (2002 Cavaliers at Semis, 2009 Blue Devils)
-
Either is equally valid.0
-
Both are valid, but the normal interpretation is #1, because when two corps are assigned the same number, that represents two different "scores".
-
Both are valid, but the normal interpretation is #2, because a "score" is just the number itself, not the assignment of that number to a particular performance.
-
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.