N.E. Brigand Posted August 14, 2014 Share Posted August 14, 2014 So why not just use "similarity" or "simulation"? Simulacrum is a fine word with a long pedigree. (After all, if it was good enough for Plato and Nietzsche...) "Simulation" doesn't necessarily convey the sense of "second rate" that has come to be attached (for more than a century) to zzZ's chosen word. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRASSO Posted August 14, 2014 Share Posted August 14, 2014 MendaCity Law Firm of Dewey, Cheatem, & Howe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeN Posted August 14, 2014 Share Posted August 14, 2014 Yes, this. I'm talking about simulated difficulty in drill, simulated difficulty in substituting body movement for drill, simulated difficulty in sleight-of-hand staging and arranging that avoids moving while playing, simulated sound, simulated GE (props galore, uniforms varying year to year, or within shows). And scores that seem to reward the Simulacrum. I want real demand, real drill, real acoustic sound, and real achievement awarded by real scores. But what does "simulated GE" have to do with real demand, drill, etc? Uniforms have nothing to do with it. Mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
corpsband Posted August 14, 2014 Share Posted August 14, 2014 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRASSO Posted August 14, 2014 Share Posted August 14, 2014 (edited) I'm not so sure I like this blue toned cranky little guy. That said, I like his uniform and shako here much better than the goofy looking ones that Crown has now. Edited August 14, 2014 by BRASSO 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldbandguy Posted August 14, 2014 Share Posted August 14, 2014 You know...I didn't notice any SIMULACRUM/SIMULATED screaming and cheering in the stands when the corps completed their performances. I did see and hear THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of fans all across the country that were THRILLED with the state of DCI in 2014. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff Ream Posted August 14, 2014 Share Posted August 14, 2014 if you hate it that much, stay the #### home Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRASSO Posted August 14, 2014 Share Posted August 14, 2014 (edited) Can we agree at least that it'd be great to someday see the return of the Simulacrum with the return of the Simulcast ? Maybe if we're lucky the simulacrum and the simulcast will return simultaneously. Edited August 14, 2014 by BRASSO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
troon8 Posted August 14, 2014 Share Posted August 14, 2014 ...And the tarps in a certain narration-laden show were not of real people, but homunculi, which was why the audience had so much difficulty identifying them. I can tell how enthusiastic you are about the word, but just because they were pictures of people you didn't recognize doesn't make them homunculi. Nor did it mean they were not pictures of "real people." (Unless you're referring to the pictures themselves as homunculi, which is a whole other can of semantic worms.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zigzigZAG Posted August 14, 2014 Author Share Posted August 14, 2014 So, to cut this down to something to chat about: there's more of a WGI influence in DCI. Yep. It's been said many times here that WGI is where most of the innovation is now that DCI cribs from . . .so it's not really a surprise. Marry that up with how the stage/set piece/re-stage is rewarded more than the whiplash drill of old and there's the rub. Something else to consider: Well, DCI has always been a hatchet-job on Broadway/jazz/dead white guys/wind ensemble stuff; a pastiche (with some exceptions, yes) of someone else's work. And, yup, in this day and age where a meme is born every minute . . .folks are probably going to respond to an "oh, I get that" wink and nod rather than a more long-form engagement. Those types of knowing nods make the designer feel smart in his pastiche . . . and the audience member feel like they're brilliant in catching onto it: a perfect circle of smug. Anyhoo, it's all good: we'll cycle through to something else in another five or seven years. We always do. I'm not talking about 'cribbing' other work from other idioms (broadway, film, etc.), but simulating things like demand, or simulating brass sounds themselves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.