Jump to content

Cadets 2017


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, xandandl said:

I understood that no further permissions for marching bands and drum corps were given after 2008; the nephew who held the estate was supposedly not pleased 

Cadets in 2009 had permission because of their previous use and permission which were well received. I can't speak of further specifics. Ask Hop to explain it all. He gives a short synopsis on the '17 show announcement.

 

1 minute ago, tesmusic said:

The Bernstein Estate made the official change in September of 2010.

I know there were programs licensed in 2010.   But September would be AFTER the MB season started so  that date makes more sense to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, corpsband said:

 

I know there were programs licensed in 2010.   But September would be AFTER the MB season started so  that date makes more sense to me.

It's also never been impossible to get permission, but the hoops groups have to jump through deterred many I believe.

http://www.musicforall.org/resources/copyright/leonard-bernstein

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, tesmusic said:

It's also never been impossible to get permission, but the hoops groups have to jump through deterred many I believe.

http://www.musicforall.org/resources/copyright/leonard-bernstein

good post. I knew I had seen it somewhere but couldn't quite remember where other than an article a few years back in the NY Times or some such. Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, tesmusic said:

It's also never been impossible to get permission, but the hoops groups have to jump through deterred many I believe.

http://www.musicforall.org/resources/copyright/leonard-bernstein

the "hoops" are really not that burdensome.  it's mostly a matter of getting arrangements done really early in your design process.  they actually do look at your scores -- it's not just a pro-forma "mail it in and you get permission".   

I suppose if your arrangements are not respectful of the original  -- it could be difficult.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, xandandl said:

good post. I knew I had seen it somewhere but couldn't quite remember where other than an article a few years back in the NY Times or some such. Thanks.

No worries

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, corpsband said:

the "hoops" are really not that burdensome.  it's mostly a matter of getting arrangements done really early in your design process.  they actually do look at your scores -- it's not just a pro-forma "mail it in and you get permission".   

I suppose if your arrangements are not respectful of the original  -- it could be difficult.

I agree-but I could seem some groups not wanting to go through the process.

To be honest, I have issue with what they request, especially with keeping the integrity of the music.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, xandandl said:

reread again. John 13:27 has him leaving early.  You are correct that the Eucharist has its origin in the Last Supper. To consider the DCP ground rules, further discussion of this should send me a pm.

I think I found the Euchreist.

 

epc_Small.jpgimage0031-300x200.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, tesmusic said:

I agree-but I could seem some groups not wanting to go through the process.

To be honest, I have issue with what they request, especially with keeping the integrity of the music.

I'm sure it filters out a lot of nonsense.  Maybe more composers should do that!  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, corpsband said:

I'm sure it filters out a lot of nonsense.  Maybe more composers should do that!  

Exactly! Having judged countless shows over the last 15 years or so, I wish more would be done for musical accountable to insure quality writing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, tesmusic said:

Exactly! Having judged countless shows over the last 15 years or so, I wish more would be done for musical accountable to insure quality writing.

I can see issues with a hard and fast interpretation of what "respectful" means.  When someone does a masterful job of weaving two pieces together,  looking at the arrangement from just one composer's POV might be a problem.   Some of my favorite arrangements over the years involve a "re-imagining" which may go in a direction the original creator never considered.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...