OrlandoContraAlum Posted April 5, 2018 Share Posted April 5, 2018 1 minute ago, Tommeee said: They were removed from bowl game eligibility. So, yes, they did miss football. Fair point. I stand corrected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff Ream Posted April 5, 2018 Share Posted April 5, 2018 54 minutes ago, barigirl78 said: The next question is "how many people in power knew and did nothing?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommeee Posted April 5, 2018 Share Posted April 5, 2018 2 minutes ago, barigirl78 said: I was in the 1976 Crossmen that was removed from competition because corps management allowed an overage member. I was not over-age and neither was most of the corps. Yet, we were punished. Same thing happened to the Bridgemen and Muchachos earlier. I'm not knowledgeable about the details of the Crossmen, Bridgemen, or Muchachos. But I stand by my opinion. When a person does something wrong, THAT PERSON is the one who should be punished. Not the organization as a whole. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff Ream Posted April 5, 2018 Share Posted April 5, 2018 46 minutes ago, Tony Flores said: i think we all did...but didnt want to face facts. this is crushing TBH. no I literally knew. Timing and everything. But I know people involved on all sides. my hearts out to all. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
84BDsop Posted April 5, 2018 Share Posted April 5, 2018 1 minute ago, Tommeee said: They were removed from bowl game eligibility. So, yes, they did miss football. Uhhh...no You have to qualify for bowl games. They played the regular season. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post mcjordansc Posted April 5, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted April 5, 2018 7 minutes ago, Tommeee said: To be fair, the newspaper did not find "evidence". They found people who would talk. It's important to realize that it isn't the same thing. Also, I'm not saying I don't believe it. That's not for me to say, one way or the other. The things Hopkins says are true is enough to have a normal CEO removed from the position. He admits to "consensual" relationships with corps members and employees. He did share a hotel room with a female subordinate at the DCI meetings. This alone should disqualify him holding the job. 17 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbc03 Posted April 5, 2018 Share Posted April 5, 2018 13 minutes ago, Tommeee said: I can't imagine that it would come to that, but the idea of removing The Cadets entirely from DCI events is ridiculous and would mostly just hurt the current members. If George isn't immediately fired then once schools start hearing about this The Cadets are going to have a hard time finding a place to sleep this summer. The sponsorships they are likely to lose are going to make it hard to pay the bills as well. George being fired is the absolute minimum that YEA needs to do to weather this and I'd argue that the board needs to go as well. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff Ream Posted April 5, 2018 Share Posted April 5, 2018 17 minutes ago, HockeyDad said: Yet another board of directors who could find absolutely no evidence. But the newspaper could. This is such a pattern. Sad. Talk about enablers. Cadets is more than one person and will survive and thrive......assuming the correct actions are taken SOON to remove the director. hang on...we don't know what the Board did or didnt find. I know people contacted by the boards attorney as recently as two weeks ago. Not all investigations wrap up in a week Mr. Mueller Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post SFZFAN Posted April 5, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted April 5, 2018 DCI should do the right thing and reverse ALL of the rules changes Hop initiated over the years. 4 5 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommeee Posted April 5, 2018 Share Posted April 5, 2018 2 minutes ago, 84BDsop said: Uhhh...no You have to qualify for bowl games. They played the regular season. PSU was NOT eligible for bowl games, despite winning enough games during the regular season to normally be considered eligible. There is no reason to argue this fact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts