George Dixon Posted July 1, 2019 Share Posted July 1, 2019 25 minutes ago, Jeff Ream said: San Antonio was worse. I yelled at him as I watched him on my tv SAT he was ridiculous. I couldn't believe they had him during finals week after that. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff Ream Posted July 1, 2019 Share Posted July 1, 2019 6 minutes ago, George Dixon said: SAT he was ridiculous. I couldn't believe they had him during finals week after that. I was amazed he was used again without a very strong talking to after 2/3 years ago 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EricS Posted July 1, 2019 Share Posted July 1, 2019 3 hours ago, N.E. Brigand said: Well, that was part of the argument for making this change, and since the rule passed, apparently a number of people at DCI were convinced. That said, I would be curious as to when you think design was most dangerous for judges on the field. Or for anyone: which were the shows with the greatest potential to injure a judge who wasn't quick on his or her feet? who cares about the judges. it's the kids they need to be concerned about Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EricS Posted July 1, 2019 Share Posted July 1, 2019 3 hours ago, fsthnds said: Or on the east coast, the Poole Rule. Watched him judge Saturday night and he looked very uncomfortable restricted to the front sideline. then he should quit 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff Ream Posted July 1, 2019 Share Posted July 1, 2019 25 minutes ago, EricS said: then he should quit they'd be out of drum judges 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EricS Posted July 1, 2019 Share Posted July 1, 2019 23 minutes ago, Jeff Ream said: they'd be out of drum judges i'm sure they could drum up somebody. punn intended 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevedci Posted July 1, 2019 Share Posted July 1, 2019 to what extent do you think rule was more about making performance evaluations less objective - reducing the ability assess percussion up close - than safety? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N.E. Brigand Posted July 1, 2019 Share Posted July 1, 2019 1 hour ago, EricS said: who cares about the judges. it's the kids they need to be concerned about Well, as far as the question of having judges on the field, it works out to the same thing. So again I'd be curious to hear people's thoughts on what shows were most dangerous for judges to be on the field: meaning either dangerous for the judges or dangerous because the judges were there. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skevinp Posted July 1, 2019 Share Posted July 1, 2019 1 hour ago, EricS said: i'm sure they could drum up somebody. punn intended I think they want to stick with the ones they have. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cfirwin3 Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 1 hour ago, stevedci said: to what extent do you think rule was more about making performance evaluations less objective - reducing the ability assess percussion up close - than safety? To no extent. This was about incidents not theory. Even this thread is pointing to specific moments of conflict with judges being in the wrong place at the wrong time. On the contrary, it will be up to designers to stage the drum features so that they can get the credit they want. It's not possible to bargain with the judging panel at recaps to earn a better score for things that they couldn't see. This decision puts more pressure on the corps staff and really relieves the pressure from the judges. They said that it's about safety and it absolutely is. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.