Jump to content

Sioux City, IA - Tuesday, July 9, 2019


Recommended Posts

Not super shocked to see Crossmen up on Mandarins, Crossmen are very good this year.  

But I do think having no VP or CG judges definitely exaggerated that spread since Mandarins have been scoring very well in those two sub captions.  That .7 deficit in VA would have been less than .25 if the other two visual sub captions were there.  

Interested to see how the next few days turn out.  

Edited by DrumManTx
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DrumManTx said:

Not super shocked to see Crossmen up on Mandarins, Crossmen are very good this year.  

But I do think having no VP or CG judges definitely exaggerated that spread since Mandarins have been scoring very well in those two sub captions.  That .7 deficit in VA would have been less than .25 if the other two visual sub captions were there.  G

Interested to see how the next few days turn out.  

The Crossmen also have a very good Color Guard.  Their Visual Analysis scores are their best caption, but Color Guard is their second best.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DrumManTx said:

Not super shocked to see Crossmen up on Mandarins, Crossmen are very good this year.  

But I do think having no VP or CG judges definitely exaggerated that spread since Mandarins have been scoring very well in those two sub captions.  That .7 deficit in VA would have been less than .25 if the other two visual sub captions were there.  

Interested to see how the next few days turn out.  

I think Bones would have wanted the CG Score - they are crushing it this year...trailed bluecoats and SCV by less than a point in color guard last night. 

Edited by Malaguena88
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DrumManTx said:

Not super shocked to see Crossmen up on Mandarins, Crossmen are very good this year.  

But I do think having no VP or CG judges definitely exaggerated that spread since Mandarins have been scoring very well in those two sub captions.  That .7 deficit in VA would have been less than .25 if the other two visual sub captions were there.  

Interested to see how the next few days turn out.  

or percussion - scores would have been something like:

Cadets 80

Crossmen 77.5

Mandarins 76.75

if you fill in the missing captions with prior type scores

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, DrumManTx said:

Not super shocked to see Crossmen up on Mandarins, Crossmen are very good this year.  

But I do think having no VP or CG judges definitely exaggerated that spread since Mandarins have been scoring very well in those two sub captions.  That .7 deficit in VA would have been less than .25 if the other two visual sub captions were there.  

Interested to see how the next few days turn out.  

What happened to full panels every show? 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Terri Schehr said:

What happened to full panels every show? 😉

There actually were eight judges, but three of them were insects.

No one can understand what their sheets say.

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...