Sign in to follow this  
PamahoNow

2019 Predictions -- Revisited

Recommended Posts

I predicted whoever scored highest won.

 

I was right

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, mfrontz47 said:

People underestimated Bloo. 

They ALWAYS underestimate Bloo.

And Bloo doesn't mind.

Wait for next year's thread... It'll be a gas... full of all sorts of pseudo-statistics and historical projections.

Looking forward to it.

For me, Cadets projections were the most surprisingly off... including my own.

Edited by cfirwin3
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Jeff Ream said:

I predicted whoever scored highest won.

 

I was right

Yeah, ... I saw it, but I "forgot" to include it.  Credit to you.  How you do it every year I don't know.  I'm crediting an especially close relationship to the Divine and his special communication of the future to you.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, PamahoNow said:

Yeah, ... I saw it, but I "forgot" to include it.  Credit to you.  How you do it every year I don't know.  I'm crediting an especially close relationship to the Divine and his special communication of the future to you.

nothing quite so lofty LOL. Just an understanding of math

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I predicted a BD win in both predictions and Bloo 2nd with a show as popular as Inferno in 2015

I also had scouts falling a bit

 

 

I was wrong about 

Boston at 3

SCV missing a medal

Crown falling to 6th

SOA in at 12 and either Crossmen/Mandarins out at 13

Music City rising

Pacific Crest!?

 

I was in the ballpark for the rest.

Edited by ThePlanets
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, ThePlanets said:

I predicted a BD win in both predictions and Bloo 2nd with a show as popular as Inferno in 2015

I also had scouts falling a bit

 

 

I was wrong about 

Boston at 3

SCV missing a medal

Crown falling to 6th

SOA in at 12 and either Crossmen/Mandarins out at 13

Music City rising

 

I was in the ballpark for the rest.

Did you get PC right?  If you did, let's go to Vegas!

i was amazed and very pleased and I'm a huge PC homer. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, CrownBariDad said:

Did you get PC right?  If you did, let's go to Vegas!

i was amazed and very pleased and I'm a huge PC homer. 

Lol no. I was thinking about that while I was driving between buildings a few min ago and was going to add it. I might have given them a 15 ceiling but I had them around 19th.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Jeff Ream said:

nothing quite so lofty LOL. Just an understanding of math

I saw that math thing on the other thread ..... adding this to that, dividing then multiplying then adding.  Way too much math.  Any formula like that is 1) too hard to figure out and 2) could never be understood my mere mortals.

I'm sticking with the divine explanation. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, PamahoNow said:

I saw that math thing on the other thread ..... adding this to that, dividing then multiplying then adding.  Way too much math.  Any formula like that is 1) too hard to figure out and 2) could never be understood my mere mortals.

I'm sticking with the divine explanation. 

All motion is relative, but we tend to think of one thing as being fixed and the other thing as being moving. An ninertial frame of reference is one which the law of inertia is valid. All frames of reference moving at a constant velocity with respect to an inertial frame are also inertial frames.

 

 

 

The detail in the pattern is movement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, ThePlanets said:

All motion is relative, but we tend to think of one thing as being fixed and the other thing as being moving. An ninertial frame of reference is one which the law of inertia is valid. All frames of reference moving at a constant velocity with respect to an inertial frame are also inertial frames.

 

 

 

The detail in the pattern is movement.

Now this makes sense.  Maybe someone should do a show about this.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.