Jump to content

Jason

Members
  • Posts

    4,478
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Jason

  1. of course it makes sense. It is EXACTLY what happened in 1972 that led to the birth of DCI.

    A group of corps got fed up with the way the VFW ran corps competitions and they broke off and started DCI.

    It amazes me that DCI cant see that they have now become the VFW and history is on the verge of repeating itself.

    The two, while similar on the surface, are DRASTICALLY different when examined in full.

    The VFW/AL circuits provided little or no voice to the corps that participated in them. Corps weren't allowed to make the rules, and that was a major tiff back when the split came to pass. Corps were fed up being dictated by what they saw as a small minded minority who held all the cards. So they left to do their own thing. What they did (provide a structure for corps to determine what was best for themselves) made a lot of sense to a lot of corps, and the organization grew.

    40 years later, we have a small group of individuals who RUN DCI who are saying "You know what, we want to do our own thing, forget you guys." The major difference is the G7 corps HAVE the ability to do whatever they want. THEY ARE THE BOD. They can make the rules, they can do whatever they want provided they can get the other corps to agree with it. The other corps are saying "NO, this isn't in our best interst," while the G7 are simply saying "Well, eff off then."

    They're pulling the exact same stunt they pulled on DCM about 10 years back. The top corps said "Hey, you know what, we want to move control over to DCI." They got the DCM corps to agree with it, provided that after a year, if it didn't work out for the DCM corps they would return the DCM structure. After a year when the DCM corps said "You know what...we like the way things were running with DCM." The top five said "Well..screw you guys. We're taking our toys and leaving."

    The VFW in the 70's gave the corps no representation. The G7 simply want to take their toys and pout that they cant have everything they want, even if everything they want will cost the existence of every corps except for them.

  2. Mason has the best advice to the G-7... " I have a professional group. Leave this ( DCI ) alone. "

    There is " no compromise " with the G-7 vision. It's a selfish, self serving power grab to establish a permanent group slotting system within the World Class Division of DCI and kill off the Open Class Division while in the process. It would serve as a death panel to the Drum Corps activity as something separate and distinct from the Band activity. It's in keeping with the Hopkins long held vision of the morphing of the Drum Corps idiom into band in which the end result will be only..... band.

    Either give up this arrogance, or leave and pursue your vision thingy on your own.

    Those are the choices.

    I would say, to all the corps that are out of the "G7"...

    I think it's time you turned to the senior folks and started working to establish a new division at DCA. If the G7 corps want to do their own thing, let them. Soon it will be a G5, then a G3, and at some point it'll just beTThe Blue Devils Touring Ensemble".

  3. So color me confused...

    Drum corps cant survive because it's too expensive....so the best thing we can do is INCEASE the expense by adding more kids. Which means higher transportation costs, higher equipment costs, more instructors, more uniforms, more food, more support staff.

    Yes, that makes perfect sense. Why don't we reduce the cost of the activity by upping the cost of doing business.

    And now..the "top 7" want to throw a tantrum and take their toys and play "over there". (Funny, I remember there was a time when there was a fight to make the top 21).

    No wonder DCI corps cant make it. They're led by a pack of morons.

  4. I'm certain the top bands could knock out some of the lower 21. I mean, it's like having the top college football team play...say...the Minnesota Vikings.

    Which is NOT to say that marching a "lower" placing corps is NOT a valuable experiance. I learned more from my months with Pioneer concerning performance, dedication, and my craft on my horn then I did in my years at college studying for my music education degree.

    But then again, my college football team wouldn't stand a chance against the Minnesota Vikings.

  5. I thought the 1994 Cavaliers show was pretty sexually suggestive.

    Leather studded cross sash. Guard showing "man nipple". One part of the show had a guard member ascending a big pole surrounded by the rest of the guard. Some sort of "right of passage" motif...

    Oh and that big flesh colored rope thing they used as guard equipment with the knot at the end... Now what was that supposed to be alluding too?

    And I totally agree with the 91 Regiment "Colorguard spread Eagle to trigger the horns to the box". That was completely inspired! Loved it!

    Actually, I thought that part was the ascent of man...problly went to Jungia with it and should have gone more Freudian with it.

×
×
  • Create New...