Jump to content

madcontra99

Members
  • Posts

    330
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by madcontra99

  1. To be honest, I hate the idea of amped vocals and instruments in the marching art form. That being said, there have been shows that I have absolutely adored that have had these things in them.

    In other words, I hate the idea of electronics, but if it works for the show, and doesn't take away, then it works for me.

    If I had a vote, they would be gone, but I don't, so I will grin and bare it until I see the show, if the show still sucks after, then I won't like them in that show.

    BD 2005, loved the music, hated the dialogue, but that show wouldn't have been clear to everyone without YOWZA, so it worked. If that makes any sense...

  2. Lol...ok, I actually agree with you ALOT, but..... for one, its been pretty well established that you dont have to be a drum corps arranger, to have an opinion (albeit a strong one) about arranging techniques. Its kind of the same way about having to march to have an opinion about drum corps - yeah they might not REALLY get it until they march, but their opinion is still valid. And you know what...both the add9 and the tritone+major chord are used far more in drum corps than they are proportionately in other music, but so what. I think the op was basically just trying to start a discussion because its the end of april, and we're bored. I think he did a pretty good job.

    You are right, all are entitled to their opinion, I just get sick of the whole notion of people seeing, hearing, or learning something one day and just bashing it or making their remarks for the sake of seeing their writings on a site.

    Also, I wasn't actually meaning anything about the original poster, it's all of this simplistic theory jibberish which people have spewed all over like 8 pages of text on this site in an attempt to make it look like today's arrangers simply use old and tired progressions.

    If we really wanted to have a discussion though, I think it would be great for people to analyze entire shows, instead of this portion or that portion, I think people would be pleasantly surprised with the types of writing they would actually find.

  3. I've got an idea...how about all of us pretentious "stop doing it that way" people get gigs working for a corps, get a gig as a brass arranger, get a gig as, dare I say, a MARCHING BAND ARRANGER, and when you do, and your music is being used by a group other than the www.finalemusic.com forums or the Sibelius site where all the geniuses post their wonderful music, then you can make your points about how you know sooo much about theory and chord progressions and people will pay attention.

    Until then, let's not use our 4th semester theory lecture notes as a way to make ourselves sound like we have a valid point.

    Oh, and before some tool flames me or makes a remark as though I do not know anything about theory or makes an assumption that I do not arrange for any groups, IM me and I can let you know that I have accomplished these things.

  4. Requiem is really good. I'm actually really impressed by it, should be good.

    I really wish they weren't playing Kashmir though.... I mean..seriously drum corps, stop playing rock music, it doesn't work. However, Kashmir might be tolerable if they take some influence from the Puff Daddy version for the movie Godzilla.... I'm just sayin

    So no rock music in drum corps-is this a blanket statement that you don't like corps that use rock music, or you just don't like the idea of rock music.

    If we go to corpsreps, you'll find that rock music has been used many times and has worked many times. Not to mention, did you listen to the recording of Kashmir, if you did, does it really sound like a rock tune, or just as the source material. I think the writing of the horn book makes Kashmir it's own vehicle and gives it its own style, but that's just from being at camp and not making assumptions about the show or its music.

  5. I don't think I've ever known any Cavalier to do the shako plume bob at the end of a show. We made fun of it in rehearsal sometimes, but that's about it.

    @flyingkadet: How exactly do the Cavaliers bounce while moving backward. Given the technique, I think it is outright impossible to do so.

    Watch the end of the shows from 1991-1995, if you have the PBS where they don't cut out right after the show like on the legacy DVD's you can see, but yeah, the Cavies had some snares at the end of 1992 and 1995 in particular that flailed their heads at the end of the shows.

  6. First off, the greatest company front ever in my opinion was the Madison Scout 1997. That being said.

    I don't think corps use them very often anymore because well...most can't do them. I mean really. Why do most corps march from random blob to a newly developed random blob, because you can hide that lack of marching ability by not marching obvious forms like a company front.

    As far as them being tired and old, I can't really jump on that argument. That's like high mark time being old and tired. It comes down to whether or not a group can do it. If you can't, you hide from it.

    I think it's a general lack of ability, and in my opinion, most of the "top 12" would struggle with a company front, so they hide from them.

  7. I am against it. I want that to be known. However, I feel that if a corps is going to use this, it is also their fault if a show suffers because of electronics. I saw a show at BOA this year, yes I am going to talk about BOA for a moment. At finals, their sound system went a little wacky and ruined the show, lost all effectiveness for me, and I had seen it earlier in the season and loved it. So at finals the show was not nearly as strong as it should have been. I think the group suffered in points due to this and that's the thing behind it. If a corps uses these things and they work and the show is better, ok, good for you, if it breaks and fails, its your fault.

    Look at Cadets 2006. Much like 2005, but with more vocal. People dug 2005, many disliked 2006. Now we can complain and say it wasn't performed as high of a level, but in reality, I think the electronics helped it to not be as strong a show. They made the choice, many didn't like it, some did, but ultimately, I would say it was a mis-step in show design.

    That being said, again, if groups use it, and it works, yay for them, if it doesn't, get off the soap box, you dropped the ball. Just my take.

×
×
  • Create New...