Jump to content

pearlsnaredrummer77

Members
  • Posts

    975
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by pearlsnaredrummer77

  1. Since alumniof's recent experience came from Allentown, I will unequivocally state, compared to recent shows there, the Allentown shows from the late 70s & early 80s had bigger crowds, more raucous crowds, and many times more spontaneous standing Os throughout the evening. That's a fact. Now, what to make of it all?

    As to the OPs original question, the 'artists' in charge hate G horns- didn't they ban them awhile back?

    There are plenty of 'WASs and WEREs' in every activity, of course.

    Allentown a 1/2 dozen years ago was my last show and I was bored to death & my SO (not a drum corps person) has vowed to never undergo such an experience again. We do go to DCA & Alumni shows. At this point, I think DCI is ready to turn the corner & come out of the closet as band. It sure as heck isn't drum & BUGLE corps anymore.
  2. Wasn't really the Brass Caption Head. Quit way before the competitive season began if I recall correctly.

    Wow.,. The Pittsburgh story is too close to home. Right across the river from my hometown. The school board president is the older brother of a classmate. It's a terrible story on so many levels. The other story-a 14 year old girl! I just don't understand this.,,, i wish there was a better way to weed out individuals predisposed to this behavior.

  3. Actually, Crown has already included a flute sample in their field show.

    _________________

    I've always wondered how they would police samplers, modern synths, etc. You can sample just about anything, assign it to a key and the judge probably never knows what you are doing.

    The irony of all of this is I started playing drums to get away from woodwinds (especially the clairnet which I played with very little enthusiasm) and to be in a drum and bugle corps because of the 'pure' brass sound.

    Now those darned woodwinds are sneaking back and bugles are dead. Who woulda thunk? :music:

  4. Having said that, I know how to get around all the electronics rules using keyboard functions that would take someone staring at the score to see. (And no, I won't tell. I like my cheaters.)

    I have wondered that myself. I think there are myriad way to cheat with a decent synth and maybe a sequencer these days. What judges would actually know what I was doing if I mapped a sample of a difficult brass riff and played it when necessary? What judge would actually know the difference if I showed up with my Roland w-30 and Juno G? Do they care about the difference in quality of sound between synths? I just see so many potential problems with judging a new instrument family-especially one that has so many different types of sound generation from sampler, to sample based synth, to pure analog, digital, etc. I love synths and been playing them since the 80s-but don't think they are appropriate for this activity. Some things are better accoustic.

  5. True some people who haven't dealt with this have the idea that a clear check means the person is safe when all it might mean is not caught or reported. IMO about all checks do are help to guard against those who were caught or a CYA for the group that at least they are doing something. But also needed is a policy to update the checks every now and then. Know mine is way out of date......

    Such a sick world we live in. I wonder if preventative training from police might be a good idea. Not so much for the offender, but for the kids to know signs to look out for such as the "coaching", etc. it seems like these types do have certain common methodologies. The better educated a young corp's member is, the better they are able to protect themselves. I believe some police departments do stuff like this as part of community outreach?

    • Like 1
  6. If we really want to go back that far, the original Americans, the Indians, think evolution sucks. They are getting their revenge now in the form of certain tribes, with casinos and cigarette sales, etc., but for the most part, they aren't exactly fans of ours. Bur we don't have their opinions on Bb's vs. G's and electronics....

    Actually 'we' do. I am part Native. :)

    • Like 1
  7. I've read this idea in another thread, but today's activity lacks a groove that can get audiences involved in the performance. I think that the choppy nature of today's shows and the popularity (with staff) of orchestral music rather than big band, approachable jazz, soul, etc., has turned it into more of a passive audience activity for the average audience member. I always think of the groove in Blue Devil's 76 Legend. The drum major is dancing, the audience grooving-just a total participatory moment. I think the modern arranger/director that can recapture that mojo will be regarded as the new Zingali of the activity.

    • Like 1
  8. I've read this idea in another thread, but today's activity lacks a groove that can get audiences involved in the performance. I think that the choppy nature of today's shows and the popularity (with staff) of orchestral music rather than big band, approachable jazz, soul, etc., has turned it into more of a passive audience activity for the average audience member. I always think of the groove in Blue Devil's 75 Legend. The drum major is dancing, the audience grooving-just a total participatory moment. I think the modern arranger/director that can recapture that mojo will be regarded as the new Zingali of the activity.

  9. Cut the size of corps to 128.

    Establish formal funnel routes from g7 auditions to other corps

    Limit spending on pit

    Establish a minimum # of years for use of instruments

    Cut pit size

    Eliminate electronics & synths

    Reestablish regional tours with top corps only meeting infrequently (builds drama)

    Establish standardized maximum staff salaries

    Age out for World 20

    Age put for Open 21

    I know none of these suggestions will be popular, but the theme is cutting costs and encouraging more open corps and increase their attractiveness and performance opportunities.

  10. Change is good and progress is inevitable. Reminiscing is good. Resisting change is not so good. No one will ever convince me that an outhouse is better than indoor plumbing. :satisfied:/>/>

    I think that the traditionalist argument is not about change within a given form. It's about altering that form into something else.

    Personally, I think it the amps are done well, it's not a big deal because it doesn't (or shouldn't-my concern about effects a few posts up) change the sound produced. Adding new instrument families indeed turns the activity into something else-neither better or worse. Just something else.

  11. Change is good and progress is inevitable. Reminiscing is good. Resisting change is not so good. No one will ever convince me that an outhouse is better than indoor plumbing. :satisfied:/>/>

    Well change is not always good. The industrial revolution brought about a lower standard of living for many, increased the spread of disease, gutted India's economy, intensified slavery and so on. Eventually it worked out, but we can't forget those that lived through those tumultuous changes and saw them as other than a positive good. Also, at one point communism was thought by many as progress and the ultimate form of society. So I think we always have to be aware of context and not too confident about what we alter in the name of progress.

    But you got me on the outhouse!

  12. Just impossible to compare eras. Lines before say 84/85 played practically every note of the show with less marching demand. Later lines have to run, but play far less during a show. The lines of the 50s/60s were playing to a completely different standard. Before the 1980s lines were primarily local and talent was diffused among over 250 or more corps. Moreover modern lines have a higher average age. I think the safest we can say " blank was one of the great ones!@

  13. Well put. Amps with hiss and white noise mixed in... not good.

    But then what if folks start using the effects like distortion, flange, chorus, etc. Seems like there will need to be very clear guidelines on what is legal and what is not. Don't many effects units come with looping abilities? How much training do judges have on sound systems?

  14. At the Scranton show the other night, Statesmen were on G horns. They were certainly loud, but Hawthorne and Reading were louder.

    Of course, that and five bucks will get you a cup of coffee :)

    The problem is of course that there are so many variables. How many brass for each corp's, level of playing ability, arrangement style, staging, hearing of audience participant. Etc.

    I think an experiment with one player, who would have no given preference, equally adept on either instrument in a controlled environment like a recording studio would be the best way of getting objective data.

    I also suspect that the greatest difference may not be in pure volume, but timbre.

  15. Let me know the attendance of the other alumni shows that run all year then.

    Not as big.

    I live alumni corps. But their appeal is to a segment of the audience that's going less and less. Until corps start going in more of an 80's/90's route, alumni Atendance will start to die off. Literally.

    I think there are a lot of factors. One being that Alumni Corps don't have a strong central organization to help with promotion. At this point it's almost word of mouth. The pre-season standstills often compete with bad wintery weather. I don't think it's necessarily the product, but a combination of factors.

  16. There's so many reasons and electronics and show design are just two of thousands of reasons.

    But I tell you what: since you think old time drum corps will bring the crowds flocking, let me know what the attendance is at the alumni show in 2 weeks. I love alumni corps but let me give you a hint: not as big as finals

    I think it's fair to mention that the Alumni show is (necessarily) scheduled awkwardly.

    • Like 2
  17. LegalEagle, In what post did I say I hate the current product? I have said, that you seem to ignore, in a few of my posts is that I attend DCI and DCA shows and that I enjoy them for what they are. And yes, most of what I loved about drum corps is missing from the current product which to me resembles marching bands. I do not think a marching brass band with no bugles in the brass line should call itself a drum and bugle corps or drum corps. The first line of the wikipedia definition of "drum and bugle corps" says drum and bugle corps also known as drum corps so calling them drum corps when they do not utilize bugles doesn't cut it either. By the way, I know all the four letter words that you know but I have not used them or xxxx's when corresponding with anyone on this forum. I have also not told anybody to "go to he'll" so, while you are accusing me of disrespect, you might want to audit your own posts. If you and your buddy Jeff don't like what I have to say, skip over my posts. Have a nice day!

    I kind of agree about the terminology. To my mind, when DCI added the electronics they fundamentally changed the activity. Since the 1930s the activity used brass and percussion as the sole instrumentation. Synths are neither-so there's a definite difference. Earlier developments all came from those existent instrument families. So what DCI does is something a bit different-not my cup of tea, but certainly a viable art form. I don't think that opinion somehow demeans current marchers-it says nothing about about their obvious talent, work ethic and so on.

    I also don't see how suggesting that today's DCI is an association of marching bands is a pejorative. At this point, DCI has much more in common with the current crop of (excellent) competitive high school bands than drum and bugle corps of the 1950s. Why is being a band so bad: isn't that a value judgement in itself that posits drum and bugle corp's as superior to bands? To my ears, the pure brass-preferably g/percussion sounds more pleasing than a band with synths and/or woodwinds. But that isn't a value judgement on which is 'best.' In art is their ever really a 'best'? Isn't it a matter of personal taste?

    The argument that is really a dead horse is the one that claims anyone who prefers a brass and percussion musical form believes that their time was the best or somehow defines a pure state of the activity. I am of the opinion that the golden age of the activity was years before I marched in the mid-80s. When I marched the activity was in decline.

    I think Liz's point about drum corps vets acting out at shoes is sadly true. I've sat at show and had to listen to the 'expert' opinions of veterans who should know better. Dissing the people on the field is never cool. It really isn't showing off drum corp's/marching band expertise: it's just a callous display of ignorance. And if you dislike the entertainment: do something else and let the paying customers enjoy.

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...