Jump to content

Tusayan

Members
  • Posts

    303
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Tusayan

  1. Garfield 84. Musically mildly interesting, but the drill is very unattractive. NOT the mold-breaker everyone seems to think it is IMO.

    Totally agree. Had heard so much about this legendary show and then when I was it a few years ago in one

    of the Countdown theater shows I was hugely disappointed. Couldn't figure out what all the acclaim was about.

    RE: Crown 2007, not a boring show. Definitely a cheesefest, but not boring.

  2. 2007 was, as I and others have maintained, STILL one of the finest units ever fielded in drum corps history. And I maintain that it took 2007 BD to snag the Championship from 2007 Cadets. A little less energetic performance by BD and this thread doesn't exist.

    2007 was a very good show for the Cadets but BD was clearly better that year winning quarters, semis and finals. The Cadets problem that year wasn't too much energy by the Blue Devils, it was too much narration by the Cadets. Get rid the annoying narration and that show could have won.

  3. Could you elaborate? Allowing, of course, for the problem of a given audience having a disproportionate number of home fans for any one corps, why shouldn't the opinions of those who pay to be entertained by the shows be given more consideration?

    If that was the case then the Bridgemen and Velvet Knights would have won a bunch of championships.

  4. Cavies took 1st 5 times this decade, BD only 3. Oddly enough, they both placed 3rd and 4th exactly the same number of times (2 3rd places, 1 4th for each).

    And 2010 is not part of the 00's decade, so we're starting over now.

    Decades run from years ending in 1 through years ending 0. The calendar started in year 1 AD, not year 0 so the first decade ran from 1 AD to 10 AD., etc.

    So the Cavies have won 4 titles to BD's 3 with the a potential fourth of the decade for the Devils or fifth for the Cavies coming tonight. The Cavies 3-peat doesn't count for this decade since one of those wins occurred in the previous decade.

  5. 1. emotional reaction - does it appeal to your gut? Does it evoke a range of emotions?

    2. engagement - does it consistently hold your attention?

    3. communication - is it clear what effect the performers are trying to achieve?

    4. memorability - does it stick with you?

    5. audience reaction - not just intensity, but whether positive or negative.

    Interesting but maybe too subjective to be useful.

×
×
  • Create New...