Jump to content

DCI-86

Members
  • Posts

    808
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by DCI-86

  1. I have been reading on here a lot of negative reviews of The Cadets.  I was hoping it was bias opinion or just over reaction but then I watched the video.......

    Sadly l I agree with all the comments and I feel like they have been getting the benefit of doubt, score wise, right now.

    There is almost no drill. Guard is shockingly bad and at times the whole production looks like a bad school play. I guess it’s only the quality of brass and drum line that might get them to hang on in there. 

    Unless there are major rewrites I can see them in the 10-12th range come finals. 

    I really hope Denise B is working hard in the background right now to put together a staff for 2020 that can reverse the decline.

    • Like 1
  2. On 6/15/2019 at 7:49 PM, patrick643 said:

                           DCI Tour Premiere                  

      Corps Score
    Bluecoats 1 Bluecoats 71.7
    Carolina Crown 2 Boston Crusaders 70.5
    Boston Crusaders 3 Carolina Crown 70.2
    The Cadets 4 The Cadets 65.5
    Blue Stars 5 Blue Stars 65.3
    Phantom Regiment 6 Phantom Regiment 64.7

              MidCal Champions Showcase          

      Corps Score
    The Cavaliers 1 Santa Clara Vanguard 72.4
    Blue Devils 2 Blue Devils 72.0
    Santa Clara Vanguard 3 The Cavaliers 69.1
    Mandarins 4 Mandarins 65.5
    The Academy  5 The Academy  60.3
    Troopers 6 Troopers 58.3

          Innovations in Brass: North Canton     

      Corps Score
    Bluecoats 1 Bluecoats 73.0
    Boston Crusaders 2 Boston 71.5
    The Cadets 3 Cadets 68.5
    Phantom Regiment 4 Phantom 64.0

                          Drums On Parade                    

      Corps Score
    Carolina Crown 1 Carolina Crown 72.4
    Madison Scouts 2 Blue Stars 67.9
    Blue Stars 3 Crossmen 64.3
    Crossmen 4 Colts 63.8
    Colts 5 Madison Scouts 61.4 61.4

                                  DCI West                           

      Corps Score
    Blue Devils 1 Santa Clara Vanguard 73.3
    Santa Clara Vanguard 2 Blue Devils 72.5
    The Cavaliers 3 The Cavaliers 71.0
    Mandarins 4 Mandarins 68.0
    The Academy 5 The Academy 66.0
    Troopers 6 Troopers 61.8

                            DCI Crossroads                      

      Corps Score
    Carolina Crown 1    
    The Cadets 2    
    Blue Stars 3    
    Crossmen 4    
    Colts 5    
    Madison Scouts 6    

                        Moonlight Classic                     

         Corps Score
    Santa Clara Vanguard 1    
    The Cavaliers 2    
    Blue Devils 3    
    Mandarins 4    
    The Academy 5    
    Troopers 6    

     

  3. 52 minutes ago, Cleveland1 said:

    While i definitely agree that people should pump the brakes on this a bit, I think there is a strong case to be made. Assuming that SCV staff retention is high for the near future. This staff knows how to make a winner and they've methodically improved every aspect of the corps over the last decade. The corps was treading water in the late 2000s in terms of competitive placement. While the corps was getting closer after adding the rennicks and shaw (and others but they are the bigger names), it wasn't until last season when Gaines stepped in that they medaled. Even with him coming in late to the process for Ouroboros, you still felt his impact on the show. Just a reminder that once he became the drill designer and visual coordinator for the Cavies, they medaled 12/14 years. Once he left they dropped to 8th. While a corps is definitely far greater than one person, his impact is substantial and immediate. I just don't imagine SCV not putting out shows that are competing for a championship in most years as long as this staff is together. 

    THIS!!!!  It's not about the win, it's about what they have been building towards over the past few years.  Putting Michael Gaines in place was the final piece of the jigsaw and I believe we are going to see them dominate for the next few years and force others to review how they construct shows.

    I am sure SCV will be exploring new ideas and concepts following this year's success.  They know what works: They know how to get the audience on their side and the same with the judges

  4. As others have said, next year Cadets needs to find/establish/assert their modern identity.  Without all the distractions they should be able to do this.  I also believe they will need to attract some new design talent, if they want to compete with the groups in the top 6 (definitely need a guard with more personality and interesting writing and the same with their drill/staging).

    I am confident they are in good hands to make all this happen and to make the best decisions for the future of the Cadets.  

    The 'taste they have left in everyone's mouths' is a positive one (as opposed to the opposite last year even before all the GH issues came to the surface) so they should be in a good place to compete for talented members.

    • Like 1
  5. I meant, are we moving into a new era where SCV becomes the dominate force for a number of years, experimenting more with staging and props, leaving other corps forced  to reinvent themselves to keep pace?

    i know everyone says BD always wins the season after coming 2nd but will that be the case next year or will they start having to look at how they design their shows to keep pace with SCV?

  6. 5 hours ago, Cappybara said:

    I agree there are different variables at play but I don't agree with your conclusion. It would be one thing if BAC had a trend that indicated as such, but having just 1 show where they come 1st in guard all season, and that too back in early July seems like an outlier to me. Especially when their win on semis night is sandwiched between 2 losses. 

    Give it a rest. Time to move on. BAC worthy winners so congratulations to them. It’s clear that unless your group wins (BD) then you are going to complain and moan. Seasons over. Be gracious. Move on. 

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  7. I feel BD guard needs some new innovation in their written book- that’s what the groups above them (last night) have.

    Just watch some of the Flo videos of Boston’s guard to see the creative book they spin/dance.

    Now no one is usually as clean or well trained and as consistent from member to member as BD is, so tonight will be interesting (esp since last time Michael turner judged guard he put Cadets over Boston!)

  8. I think it they want to be competitive next year they need to go down the ‘themed costume to show route’. The old uniform makes body movement restictive and looks forced and silly.

    Imagine this year’s SCV (regardless if you like this year’s costume or not) in their traditional uniform with Aussies - it wouldn’t work. 

  9. 1 hour ago, Mello Dude said:

    Phantom was here before in 86.  Music may not be as problematic as visual but the music is an issue.  Please, go back to your helmets, they are awesome on the field.

    I don't see a recruitment issue.  I don't see a talent issue (this is so overrated).  You spend untold hours working on (at most) 6-7 minutes ensemble playing.  If you are a teacher worth ANYTHING you should be able to get middle school kids to play the book (any corps) in that amount of practice.  The problem is design and teaching.  I have high hopes.  Phantom did the same thing from 86-87.  I would also add, stop trying to be a marching band and be the corps that you are.  SCV has it figured out.  Isn't it amazing what marching and playing do with minimal props?

    Think about th huge modernisation that took place after 86 (very traditional show that didn’t score well) to 87 (all white uniforms etc.)

    Can they make the same dramatic change again or will they continue their directionless decline?

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...