Jump to content

Precious Roy

Members
  • Posts

    818
  • Joined

Posts posted by Precious Roy

  1. Please explain, not sure what you mean?

    The percussion judge was sampling ("paying attention to," in a sense) different parts of the show as he/she was evaluating them on different nights. Perhaps paying more attention to battery on one night, and front ensemble the other?

    Which brings up the question...are the percussion judges currently evaluating from the field or from the booth?

  2. So, IF you don't mind comparing scores from separate shows on the same night, then you shouldn't mind comparing captions either:

    Bluecoats took guard for the night (beating BD by a tenth).

    BD and Cadets tie in total GE.

    BD first and 'Coats second in visual (.6 difference).

    BD first and Crown second in Music (.4 difference).

    BD first and Crown second in percussion (.4 difference).

  3. Frankly, I think the idea that the fans know better than the instructional/design staffs who are in critique with and receiving detailed commentary from the judges is pretty funny. I'm sure such emails have been sent, but lets not kid ourselves. As a designer and instructor I've had parents/volunteers make suggestions from time to time, and I always try to be as gracious as possible, but for the most part, I'm not taking much of it very seriously (of course from time to time there's a good idea). I don't give the chef at a restaurant suggestions on how he could make his dishes better, whether I liked what I had or not.

    I would tend to agree. This is like the drum corps analog to a parent telling his kid's baseball coach that his kid should be pitching and batting cleanup.

  4. Thanks. I haven't listened to that podcast, but were the horns actually recorded bending the pitch themselves? (I mean, if they can really do that, why not do it live?) Or were the recorded playing a note, or a set of different notes, which the synthesizer then bends and/or blends? I'm guessing the latter.

    I don't recall him saying explicitly, but my assumption was/is the latter as well.

    A comparison might be: have a trumpeter record all the notes in his solo, and then have a synthesizer edit it and play it back on the field at a speed faster than human lips and fingers can manage: all 256th notes, or something like that. We couldn't fairly say that he was doing most of the work.

    I'd like to see the synth form the proper embouchure to play that solo in the first place! (But your point duly noted)

  5. I give the show a more scientific spin:

    The preshow = obvious countdown and liftoff.

    Interstellar Suite section = the chaos and acceleration associated with getting into space/orbit.

    Percussion feature = the flight transitions to orbit, which is less chaotic. There's no sound beyond your spacecraft. And the pressure differences between space and your vehicle causes metallic creaking sounds within.

    Ballad = you've been in space long enough, and now you're getting homesick

    Final number = the gradually building chaos associated with de-orbit burn and return to atmosphere, culminating in a successful touchdown.

  6. Here's where someone with some GIS skills can step up. Plot a map with the points for the home location of each DCI corps. Using those points, create Thiessen polygons that show the areas where each of those corps' home cities are the "closest" corps. Then calculate the population within each Thiessen polygon. What you end up with is an analysis of population that is considered the closest to each corps.

    Areas where there are greater clusters of corps (such as northern IL and WI, or the northeast) would have smaller polygons, whereas corps out by themselves (Troopers) would have a larger area to draw from.

  7. Do you get it? That's not enough to win. There must be meaning behind the show in order for Bluecoats compete with those who do. Not a story with characters, necessarily. Not words. Not voices. But meaning.

    [...]

    How could a judge award simply "Music, movement and shape" over "Music movement, shape, pattern and story?" They just can't.

    You must be looking too hard for the meaning, because I sure see it when I see and hear the Bluecoats' show. The meaning, the "story," whatever is -- TILT. Its all over this show, both obviously and subtly.

    As for your second point -- one could just as easily ask, "How could a judge award simply 'Music, movement and shape' over 'Music, movement, shape, and circus animals?'" The answer, of course is because sometimes the circus animals don't fit the concept of the show. In Bluecoats' case, a more defined or literal story would take away from the psychological effectiveness that the music and marching in the show provides.

    Take a look at last year. PR had a pretty obvious story throughout the entire performance, complete with an opening book drill move. SCV, while doing a show based on the music from a well known story, was actually quite effective in presenting that music with minimal reference to the story. Which show was judged higher?

    • Like 3
  8. After taking care of my own personal business and needs, I would:

    * Donate to local school districts, with the money to be used strictly for enhancement and promotion of the music education program. Instruments, better practice and performance facilities, etc.

    * Set up a multi-year deal to host a DCI show in my local area. Promote, promote, promote.

    * Set up some sort of sponsorship or scholarship program for local marchers that would like to participate in a DCI corps. Not sure how exactly this would be implemented -- perhaps strictly on need, perhaps based on ability AND need, perhaps only for a certain age or DCI rookies only. Ideally though, I would attempt to sponsor one kid in each DCI corps, including open class (don't want to play favorites, you know).

    • Like 1
  9. so then numbers really dont mean anything just placements. when assigning a score there are many many considerations including dozens of sub captions. Not easy to separate . UNLESS you are saying just do away with all that

    Oh, no, I'm not advocating this system. Just suggesting that this is one way to get around the whole "numbers management" thing that some people have issue with. I'm all for the current system in judging the performance as its performed, but without the unwritten rule of "no caption/sub-caption ties." If that percussion judge at the first show thought the units that he scored equally were indeed equally performed, then I have no problem with that.

  10. it would be very hard to wait to score after all is done , although I get what you are saying. Remember it is hours later and levels from top to bottom. note taking like the past on sheets is almost impossible

    They would be ranking as they go along, and then just assign scores after everyone has been ranked. Just start at the bottom, assign them a 50, and then each one a rank higher gets one more point, until your at the top unit, that has a score of 49 + (number of units competing).

  11. I guess I'm in the minority on this, but...

    If a judge is expected to give a score for his/her caption immediately after each corps' performance, then I have no problem with caption and sub-caption ties. If a judge is expected rate AND RANK each corps ("c'mon, its your job to determine which corps was better"), then the judge should not be compelled to score each performance until after all have performed. In that case, the scores end up essentially becoming ordinal placements, with a largely arbitrary final number attached to the ordinal. Sort of like the old system of figure skating judging.

    Following either of these philosophies, there should be no "numbers management" issues.

×
×
  • Create New...