Jump to content

alphabetmonkey

Members
  • Posts

    57
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by alphabetmonkey

  1. Was watching old YouTube videos from early 1990s concerts I attended (Jane's Addiction, Nine Inch Nails) and in the comments people are awestruck at how much fun people seem to be having at concerts then compared to now. Dancing, mosh pits, etc. Someone commented on how now, everyone stands in the audience with their phones up recording the thing rather than enjoying the event.

    • Like 5
  2. CLOSER:

     

    Tour bus on field. Horn players emerge in fear as Bloo percussion chew them out with

    I’m up there workin’ my balls off tryin’ to do somebody a favor and you m****s are suckin’ all over this joint. What kind of trumpet section do you call this tonight? And mellos! You gotta f*****’ be kiddin’ me!

    a la Buddy Rich rants

     

    Gotta get those perc scores up! GE for days!

    • Like 3
    • Haha 2
  3. With the availability of various You Tube videos available soon after performances, and the different perspectives they provide as compared to official broadcasts, it seems like the perception of how a show should be judged is highly influenced by the perspective of the viewer. Reading some of the comments about the tour premiere, you get the sense that the same performance elicited vastly different opinions depending on if the viewer was in a theater or watching the show live. In the broadcast, you are so much at the mercy of the director calling for the cuts that your experience may be significantly different than the live viewer.

     

    But insta-media seems here to stay. And organizations even have media departments now offering their curated experience to the viewer. I wouldn't mind seeing an award at the end of the season to the best depiction of the show as edited together by the organization itself. That is, each corps gets to edit together the show however it likes and present a visual package made available to the judges that represents how they feel media best presents their show. And an award for the best such presentation. Sort of like the Grammys have the awards for liner notes / packaging, etc.

     

    From a perspective of pure selfishness, I as a viewer would enjoy such a product. It would be the corps' respective visions of their own programs, calling the shots on how the remote viewer should see it (rather than making suggestions of cuts / focus of shot / etc. to the broadcaster). Assuming they own the visual media, that is.

    • Like 1
  4. I like the fake out hit at the end, it sets the tone "this is not a typical show with the typical beats you might expect."

     

    That being said, it does require more of the viewer - similar to what I experience listening to a jazz show. I agree that the transitions may need more of a thematic hook or just more substance.

     

    My ears (and eyes) also kind of want Jaco Pastorius in the Mingus tune going crazy with 16th notes in front of everything. Maybe in Bizarro DCI.

  5. 4 hours ago, Forevergreen said:

    There are some tweaks, I feel that need to be made, but God Bless the Child is good.

    Very excited for this. I am not a big fan of the original (heresy, I know) but hope Bloo find a way to express Billie Holiday's gurgly sound instrumentally. Have no idea how they are going to fit these music pieces together - maybe they don't and that is in itself part of the originality of the production.

    • Like 1
  6. 23 minutes ago, MikeRapp said:

    The scoring system is literally built to keep all corps within a point or so of the corps ahead and behind them. Even judges will tell you there is a suggestion to "keep it close" all season long, and this is encouraged by stressing both relative first scoring and a box approach to grouped scoring.

    It is practically impossible to have significant separation between corps, with the relative scoring philosophy dci use. That may not result in the wrong corps winning, but imo it certainly seems to virtually guarantee that whichever corps starts in the top three is very likely to finish there.

    I wouldn't mind status quo system with the addition of each judge's ordinal ranking of performances at the end of the night, just a simple 1,2,3,4 etc. So you can see the minutia of the scoring but also a "big picture" from each judge. It may not even have to have weight on the final score, but it would be interesting to have the info to digest. Unless this already goes on an I am just being Jane you ignorant ---

×
×
  • Create New...