I have read numerous threads concerning the "old" and "new" drum corps and whether or not a certain era of drum corps is good or bad.
Her are my general thoughts on the matter, most of which were brought to my attention by BOTH old and young drum corps members.
We all know that drum corps is an art form, as with any musical idiom. According to Webster's Dictionary, art is "the quality, production, expression, or realm, according to aesthetic principles, of what is beautiful, appealing, or of more than ordinary significance". I would also like to state that art is CONSTANTLY a constantly changing thing. All one must do to see this is look at the changes in the works of Pablo Picasso. In 1906 he created "Portrait of Gertrude Stein". This work, for all intensive purposes, looks like a person.
Found Here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:GertrudeStein.JPG
Later, in 1910, he created "Portrait of Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler".
Found Here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Picasso_...weiler_1910.jpg
Honestly, I can't tell what the hell it is, but I still know it's art. I can still admire it for it's beauty.
Now let's talk about a craft. A craft is "an occupation or trade requiring manual dexterity". A craft is something that would be done repeatedly, like carpentry or pottery. An action that takes initial knowledge and doesn't change over time.
Now to my point. I think many of the older generation of drum corps want to see the activity stay the way it was, making it a craft, when it is not. Drum corps is an art form, and must constantly evolve in order to stay true to the definition of art. Take a look at Stravinsky's "The Rite of Spring". When it was debuted in Paris, it cause a riot both inside the concert hall and on the street. The older generation despised the sounds and displays of "vulgarity" which were being portrayed in the ballet, because as the older generation saw it, it was not ballet. The older generation is correct in that The Rite was not Swan Lake style ballet. We now see The Rite of Spring as being one of the most influential works of the 20th century. It enlightened many Modern composers such as Arnold Shoenburg, Phillip Glass, and Steve Reich.
We MUST allow drum and bugle corps to evolve to some extent in order for the younger generations engaged and excited about the activity. I think we should all realize that drum corps is a dying art form and it is not a viable choice to try and keep things as they are. By allowing younger generations to help mold drum corps into something new, at least drum corps will stick around.
NOTE: Drum corps (i.e. percussion and horns) should NEVER allow woodwinds, in my opinion. That would take it from Art Form to Crap