Jump to content

Terri Schehr

Members
  • Posts

    14,334
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    307

Posts posted by Terri Schehr

  1. 8 hours ago, JimF-LowBari said:

    To go with jwillis35 when I read “corps don’t take in kids who can’t read music anymore”, my response is “corps take the most talented members. If they can fill the corps with people who can read music then no need to go further “.

    I marched with people who couldn’t read a note of music as currently as 2003.  When we’d get a change, the mellophones would gather around me and I’d play it for them three or four times.  They were quick learners, though. I’m a slave to the page of music but they weren’t.   I did teach one of my fellow members how to read though because I got tired of seeing fingerings all over the  page.  He could read after the season and proudly showed me his practically pristine music in 2004. 

    • Like 2
  2. 8 minutes ago, Slingerland said:

    Even if CAE prevails, there are other individuals who would probably be willing to go after them for misdoings of at least one person we can all think of for similar behavior (edit: depending on what PA's statute of limitations on civil cases is), so they'd be at this for years to come.

    Any concept that could be seen as having any connection to any iteration of The Cadets is likely kaput.

     

    Plus there is a lower standard of proof in civil cases. 

  3. Just now, keystone3ply said:

     

    I'm sure he is one of the "John Does" named in the lawsuit.  In the compliant statement #36, G Hopkins is named as an agent or employee who knew the abuse was about to take place & didn’t do anything to prevent. Not sure what his role was during that time, but I think he was an instructor or maybe assistant director?

    I think he was director by 82. 

    • Like 3
  4. 43 minutes ago, IllianaLancerContra said:

    I would think so.  And he who I will not speak name of is likely to be named as a defendant.  I wonder if he is one of the John Does in the current case?

    I couldn’t say but as we all know, their stories have been published in the Philadelphia inquirer.  Seems like pretty strong footing but I don’t even play a lawyer on tv. 

    • Like 1
  5. 2 hours ago, craiga said:

    I believe so. Not only that, I've been told a New Year's Eve party in 1982...about as far away from a DCI event as you can get.

    Here in Maine, one of the cases against a priest in the mid 80s was dismissed because the defendant was deceased, and the court held that it couldn't be prosecuted because that defendant was obviously unable to face his accuser.  Interesting finding, but I'm not sure I've heard of this happening anyway else.  (The Archdiocese was the codefendent and also had the case dismissed.)

    Sounds like the other survivors have much stronger civil cases. 

    • Like 3
  6. 4 minutes ago, HockeyDad said:

    Time were different. Sure. Society was different. Sure. If by that you mean, people couldn’t imagine rampant sexual abuse by people in authority was going on, and thus stringent safeguards were not in place, yes I agree. But at the same time, the standard was exactly the same as it is today:  DFTK!  

    I never thought it was a good idea for staff to date members but I saw it all the time way back when.  I once had a staff member call and ask if I’d go to a party with him and I hung up the phone. I mean he was ancient to my twenty year old self. A thirty year old.  I didn’t tell my mom what the call was about either because she would have 💩

    • Like 1
  7. 1 minute ago, IllianaLancerContra said:

    I wish that instead of softball Dan Potter questions some real journalist could ask some real hard questions & get real answers from Nick B.
     

    I also  that until all the legal process is complete (Inc SoA & anything else that might pop up between now & then) that DCI’s lawyers will strongly advise that no public comments should happen.   Again- sound legal strategy & optics/doing the right thing are at odds with one another.  

    You mean Nate but I knew who you meant.   I wasn’t expecting much and it delivered what I expected.  Don’t forget that Dan refused to speak to Tricia Nadolny several times.  

    • Thanks 1
  8. On 3/15/2024 at 1:34 PM, Chief Guns said:

    Can't believe it's been a decade already, but here's to the greatest on field performance I have ever seen live. Felliniesque is an absolute masterpiece. To quote the fan sitting near me at the Glendora show in SoCal that year............"I hope DCI has an Alien Drum Corps from outer space competing at Finals this year, because nothing on this planet is beating that!"  

     

    I first saw it on a cow pasture that they held the show at in Metamora, Illinois.  I told Jim that no one is beating that.  

    • Like 3
  9. 8 hours ago, Chief Guns said:

    Guess I will be rooting for George Jetson and Orbit City Drum Corps to win it all in 2044.

    I remember when I used to figure out how old I’d be in the year 2000 when I was a teenager. I’m not even going to think about 2044. 

    • Haha 4
  10. 18 hours ago, Lance said:

    This is why I love Crown and Bloo in particular.  I can almost always count on a musical product that's just as important to them as visual.  It's simply not the case for the majority of corps anymore, and I don't blame them with the scoring being so heavily skewed towards visual.  

    The fact that people with zero musical background are scoring music is yet another reason why scores are really a joke in the activity.  It's always been kind of a joke, though, lol.  

    I’m out of the loop about judging but you’re saying that people with no music cred are judging music? Yikes. 😳 

  11. 5 hours ago, greg_orangecounty said:

    I trust your research, I just don't remember that there were that many judges (10?) in the first half of the first decade of DCI, especially the first year. 

    I can’t remember at all.  I do remember that Briske and Rick Maass were chief judges.  I marched with Rick’s son in Guardsmen.  He looked very gruff but he  was a very nice man.  He truly cared about the kids and I think it said something that he trusted the Guardsmen enough for his son to march there. 

    Ten judges seems like a lot to me, too, but maybe there were.  I remember the ones who would walk down the line looking at feet in concert.  lol 😂 

    • Like 4
  12. 25 minutes ago, OhioBoy_99 said:

    The people have spoken and we our down to our final 4 corps:

    2016 Blue Devils

    1985 Santa Clara Vanguard

    1989 Phantom Regiment

    1998 Santa Clara Vanguard

    Check out the bracket in the original post and voting link is below or at the top as well!

    Voting:

    https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfpoJGrkKCq1qkV-V4APLya67N9NZRuFLYuX7PbBYhSkSa4rw/viewform?usp=sf_link

    Have at it!

    I’ll vote but I’m pouting. 

    • Haha 2
  13. 41 minutes ago, cixelsyd said:

    I think that is why nearly all the socioeconomic diversity we see from drum corps non-profits comes in the form of alternate program offerings.  They cannot (or will not) make the DCI drum corps format financially accessible.

    This same cost blindness then ripples through the related scholastic pageantry arts.  Then corps staff increasingly rely on these same scholastic groups, disproportionately from affluent areas, to provide experienced auditionees.

    Jim had a certain corps director tell him that it was important that they had the ability to pay, stay, and play. That was the three major criteria.  

×
×
  • Create New...