Jump to content

Thoughts on 2005 DVD


Aaw

Recommended Posts

you can tell that from the tape??

WOW - why the heck do we need field judges?? :P

Well when you hear flubbed articulations in the first, and notice that there don't seem to be any in the second, I feel justifiied in saying that. If it truly isn't the case, it at least appeared that way to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 204
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

or IVIVIV (444)

It's been a long time since I did Roman Numerals. If that's to be read "Four Hundred Forty Four", wouldn't it be DCLXIV ?

I really don't recall...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well when you hear flubbed articulations in the first, and notice that there don't seem to be any in the second, I feel justifiied in saying that. If it truly isn't the case, it at least appeared that way to me.

Not sure that I heard those flubbed articulations.....................

20 trumpets double tounging together...............AHHHHHHHHH How glorious :blink::blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure that I heard those flubbed articulations.....................

20 trumpets double tounging together...............AHHHHHHHHH How glorious :blink::blink:

well, at least that double-tonguing was better than their double-tonguing in 04, which was better than their double-tonguing in 03... it still wasn't squeaky clean, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's been a long time since I did Roman Numerals. If that's to be read "Four Hundred Forty Four", wouldn't it be DCLXIV ?

I really don't recall...

CDXLIV :)

...but that makes for some pretty funny-lookin' drill!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh whatever. We can nit pick all we want. Doesn't change the fact that Phantom has been fielding an amazing trumpet section the past few years.

And it doesn't change the fact that it was 20 trumpets double tounging 2 difficult passages........ :)

Pretty impressive!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CDXLIV :)

...but that makes for some pretty funny-lookin' drill!

yeah, but if you wanted to write 666 on the field (like phantom might for their faust show this year) you wouldn't write DCLXVI, you'd write VI VI VI.... I'm not sure about the significance of 444, but i think it's 4-4-4 and not four hundred forty-four.

Edited by TTitans909
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's been a long time since I did Roman Numerals. If that's to be read "Four Hundred Forty Four", wouldn't it be DCLXIV ?

I really don't recall...

yeah, but if you wanted to write 666 on the field (like phantom might for their faust show this year) you wouldn't write DCLXVI, you'd write VI VI VI.... I'm not sure about the significance of 444, but i think it's 4-4-4 and not four hundred fourty-four.

exactly.

~>conner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...