victorcoly Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 Webster's dictionary definition: "perfect" -- being entirely without fault or defect : flawless Sorry Mr. Carlson (CG judge Thurs) and Mr. Chumley (CG judge for semis) -- BD's guard isn't a perfect 20.0 And it's humanly impossible for them to be "perfect" 2 nights in a row. Just sayin... The aforementioned being said -- BD's guard does kick it up a notch!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Room_101 Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 Webster's dictionary definition:"perfect" -- being entirely without fault or defect : flawless Sorry Mr. Carlson (CG judge Thurs) and Mr. Chumley (CG judge for semis) -- BD's guard isn't a perfect 20.0 And it's humanly impossible for them to be "perfect" 2 nights in a row. Just sayin... The aforementioned being said -- BD's guard does kick it up a notch!! There was a BLATANT flag timing error right near the 50 and right near the front sideline halfway through the show. I thought for sure they would at least get knocked down to 19.9. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommytimp Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 There was a BLATANT flag timing error right near the 50 and right near the front sideline halfway through the show. I thought for sure they would at least get knocked down to 19.9. Maybe neither judge saw it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saxfreq1128 Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 Spreads, dude. One flag error won't knock you down to a 19.9 when the second-best guard is at a 19.8 with probably more than two errors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
victorcoly Posted August 14, 2010 Author Share Posted August 14, 2010 Maybe neither judge saw it. The problem isn't so much the number given as it is the "tolerance" level that many judges have these days. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Room_101 Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 Maybe neither judge saw it. Then they're blind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saxfreq1128 Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 Then they're blind. I repeat: spreads. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GUARDLING Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 I said it in another thread but I will again the perfect score does not mean perfect by no means just the better one on a given night. Kids will talk about the perfect score but its not that at all inANY caption when you work with just so many numbers. Some say wellll start lower. I wanna see how corps like it from maybye 9th down in the 70s becaue thats what would happen.it really is more about spreads, but we do like those numbers dont we in this activity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Room_101 Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 I repeat: spreads. In that case, they should be better with their "numbers management" earlier on. What would have happened had BD been 0.3 better than second place (19.8)? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saxfreq1128 Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 In that case, they should be better with their "numbers management" earlier on.What would have happened had BD been 0.3 better than second place (19.8)? /shrug, maybe, in the judges' opinions, they were. Hence... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.