Although it may be a rebuilding year (in administration and staff), this doesn't explain scores based upon a design that's just as effective as any other design (seen in Atlanta's show). Predictable? Hardly. Your opinion is respected but doesn't necessarily make sense when other corps have similar tempi and moves. The scouts' musical selections are awesome and quite well done. Their field design has been greatly enhanced/improved. Their guard is wonderful and their percussion is on the right track. And, the brass . . . they sound fantastic. All of this said, when a new staff takes over it does take "a rebuilding year" to make things tight(er). But, the current design of the show (musically and visually) is not the problem relating to scores. The problem is the perception that the staff has not had enough time to work with the corps to attain success (which, by now, is hardly believable) because they are so "new". The staff and administration of the scouts are doing a fantastic job and have worked harder than most corps' staff throughout this change (of leaders and of field design). The entire organization deserves much more respect and admiration for having made necessary leadership changes and then, necessary drill changes. Talk about busting your butt to get things done!! GO SCOUTS!