jasgre2000

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    2,390

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

jasgre2000 last won the day on March 28 2015

jasgre2000 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

1,533 Excellent

About jasgre2000

  • Rank
    DCP Fanatic

Profile Information

  • Your Drum Corps Experience
    Fan (High School Marching Band)
  • Your Favorite Corps
    Cavaliers, Boston Crusaders, Santa Clara Vanguard, Blue Knights
  • Your Favorite All Time Corps Performance (Any)
    Boston Crusaders 2000
  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. jasgre2000
    That't technically true, but on copyright issues the Ninth and Second circuits are considered the gold standard. Their opinions come close to holding the weight of a Supreme Court decision, as many other circuits put a lot of weight on opinions from the Ninth and Second circuits when it comes to copyright law. The Supreme Court usually only takes cases like this if there is disagreement between the circuits on a particular legal question (a "circuit split"). This case is unlikely to be taken up by the Supreme Court since, as far as I can tell, there is no circuit split. If, over time, oth
  2. jasgre2000
    It was a 9th Circuit decision. That's gold in the world of copyright infringement. Very unlikely that the Supreme Court would accept an appeal of this, IMO.
  3. jasgre2000
    Thank God! Tresona loses to a freaking high school ... surely DCI could grow some cajones and stand up to them. This part stood out to me:
  4. jasgre2000
    Sounds like you have inside information, so I’ll take you word for it that they felt it was their only choice. My point, though, was that, too my knowledge, they were not legally obligated to pay anything. Did a court order them to pay? Was a lawsuit actually filed? (If so, that’s news to me ... but it sounds from your post like there was one). At the end of the day, the payment was voluntary, even if they felt they had no other choice.
  5. jasgre2000
    🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Flo (alleged) uses AWS as its backbone. That is the same backbone used by Netflix and a majority of other streaming services. The idea that it is AWS’s fault is laughable.
  6. jasgre2000
    DCI didn’t have to cut a check. It chose to. No court has ever found that it violated any laws.
  7. jasgre2000
    Again, you don’t need a license for DVR. Archiving is a different story. Here’s a decent overview of the relevant law: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/08/victory-dvrs-cloud
  8. jasgre2000
    They don’t need sync rights to implement a DVR service. The Supreme Court has made 100% clear that time shifting constitutes fair use. Flo is just incompetent (or DCI is completely ignorant of copyright law).
  9. jasgre2000
    Just bought the 3 essentials Blu-ray’s + 2010 Blu-ray.
  10. jasgre2000
    This is what WILL happen: 1. Cavies 2. SCV 3. Blue Knights 4. Blue Devils 5. Bluecoats 6. BAC 7. Crown 8. Mandarins 9. Blue Stars 10. Crossmen 11. Cadets 12. Pacific Crest I’ll put money on it. 😉
  11. jasgre2000
    Thanks. Good advice. I’ll start with the essentials and go from there.
  12. jasgre2000
    No
  13. jasgre2000
    Since the chance of DCI getting their act together and putting up a streaming video archive are next to nil, I'm planning to start putting together my own Bluray/DVD library. Any suggestions on which years to start with?
  14. jasgre2000
    Bluecoats were not undefeated before finals week this year.
  15. jasgre2000
    Of course it happens sometimes. Everyone knew going in that Boston's guard would compete for the top (and everyone knew that Crown would compete for the brass title and that SCV would compete for tops in percussion). But as a general matter, judges have to "leave room" for the corps that perform later, which artificially deflates the scores of the corps that go on earlier. If they waited to score until everyone had performed, it wouldn't be as much of an issue.