Jump to content

CCorps

Members
  • Posts

    176
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

CCorps last won the day on March 19 2014

CCorps had the most liked content!

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

CCorps's Achievements

DCP Veteran

DCP Veteran (2/3)

108

Reputation

  1. It was over for me several years ago when, on national television, the band decided to butcher the National Anthem. I'm sure that wasn't the first time they've done this to draw attention to themselves. And unlike several individuals in various corps who found it prudent to hang notes and generally destroy America the Beautiful, this was a full-band effort to play poorly during pre-game. They're NOT doing things to be fun. They're doing things out of arrogance, malice, and spite because it humors THEM. There's more than ample evidence that confirms this.
  2. I agree...to a degree. You'd be hard-pressed to argue that a band outside of the BOA circuit has a design that COULD stand up to the top BOA contenders. And if they did have that design and talent level, I think the natural tendency would be to move to BOA to give their kids exposure to that level of excellence in an arena worthy of their time and effort. BOA is the standard for HS marching band as DCI is the standard for drum corps and WGI is the standard for indoor guard/drumline. Of course there are talented groups in other circuits but the level of design and execution excellence in those three spheres is unmatched pound-for-pound in any other circuit.
  3. Hopefully the visual caption head has improved since '07...
  4. At that level of performance, you certainly have good and bad shows but "good" and "bad" are terms relative to your personal level of performance. Barring crazy out-of-the-blue issues, the biggest perception of "good" and "bad" occurs in the members and the fans; reality doesn't reflect compelling differences. And in this system, execution isn't the be-all-end-all. Corps get credit for the intent, the ATTEMPT, and the delivery.
  5. BRASSO is in the wrong here... He's just mad that someone noted that his synopsis was an excellent, detailed, and well thought out explanation of the caption in 1980 but terribly incomplete to its usage in 2015. Then, when he had nothing else left to grab at, he chose to bite into the fact that the other poster didn't list every single thing evaluated (to include percussion) as some sort of validation that is analysis WASN'T terribly incomplete to today's definition. The fact of the matter is that BRASSO isn't WRONG. His post is just so filled with minutia when there are "bigger fish to fry" within that caption today.
  6. Staff makes a huge difference. Colts were brought up; they pushed into finals for the first time in recent years after having had consistent staff and membership loyal to that staff for several years prior. Then, key staffers leave and the corps floats back to where it was. Now, some of those key staffers are back and the Colts are climbing again. Coincidence? Not likely. You've got to build a culture that keeps membership around longer and prevents the top individuals from migrating upwards. If a corps like Colts could keep all their talent from wanting a different experience from different teachers, they'd have a much more talented corps. If you could bring those top names to them, they might stay. But for many who leave, it's not about placement, it's about learning from the best in the activity wherever they might be at the time. Look at the influx of talent to BKs drumline when Hardimon was there; the BK corps wasn't contending for titles but the best always want to learn more and learn from who they perceive to be the best. That's often misconstrued as "ring chasing" when it's a personal choice to expand their future goals. I just inserted Colts in there - you could argue the same for any corps in that grouping just about.
  7. Wouldn't count on it. Have you lived in America recently?
  8. Every single argument against this law is couched in emotion, not logic. Period. This thread is no different. That's because there is no logical appeal against this law. Mostly because those with the loudest voices refuse to acknowledge reality and are much more content to live on buzzwords and media hype.
  9. Please go elsewhere with your logic. It makes too much sense.
  10. You're telling me that a business shouldn't be entitled to make decisions for itself? I think people are confused as to what a business is. There was a post above that summarized the issue very well; race is protected. At the moment, for better or worse, orientation is not. Someday, it will be. And should be.
  11. Having lived there, I agree. This is a complete and total non-issue to DCI. Period.
  12. Furthermore, this has brought out the entitlement mentality of this activity. Those who don't subscribe to the notion that everyone is entitled to everything have been severely cut down here.
×
×
  • Create New...