FlamInvert122 Posted June 23, 2006 Share Posted June 23, 2006 i guess i have to be the jerk in this one. Cadets played one show coats played like five. Cadets have the best first show score this year coats had a 70 cadets had a 74 in first show. therefore wait until cadets have the same amount of shows and they will probably be ahead of coats. also its the first time the judges observed the show. The Cadets also had an extra week, so it makes sense that their score is the highest "first" score... it would have been a lot different if they started up last week. I'm buying into the Coats hype... at least for now! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_King Posted June 23, 2006 Share Posted June 23, 2006 The Cadets also had an extra week, so it makes sense that their score is the highest "first" score... it would have been a lot different if they started up last week.I'm buying into the Coats hype... at least for now! but judges told them what was wrong and how to fix it. cadets first time judges never heard it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Otowndrumin Posted June 23, 2006 Share Posted June 23, 2006 Cadets coming out with a 74 was a shock. Coats might be a 3rd place contender now?? I'm currently JAZZED for some new blood in the top 3!!!!! Any takers???? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TitanSop06 Posted June 23, 2006 Share Posted June 23, 2006 heck yeah. it's about time for someone new. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snurr_in_hurr Posted June 23, 2006 Share Posted June 23, 2006 i guess i have to be the jerk in this one. Cadets played one show coats played like five. Cadets have the best first show score this year coats had a 70 cadets had a 74 in first show. therefore wait until cadets have the same amount of shows and they will probably be ahead of coats. also its the first time the judges observed the show. first of all, cadets had their first show nearly a week after coats did, so naturally their starting score will be higher - very unfair comparison. also, by the time cadets have done more shows, so will have bluecoats. people always seem to find a reason why bluecoats aren't for real.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_King Posted June 23, 2006 Share Posted June 23, 2006 first of all, cadets had their first show nearly a week after coats did, so naturally their starting score will be higher - very unfair comparison. also, by the time cadets have done more shows, so will have bluecoats. people always seem to find a reason why bluecoats aren't for real.. judges help u fix scores. after 4 shows i would expect u to learn what was wrong and fix it. cadets have not heard what the judges think Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
93Bluecoat Posted June 23, 2006 Share Posted June 23, 2006 There really is no way of comparing the 'Coats and Cadets until they get a head to head meeting. We can "ballpark" it which is usually pretty close. Would anyone disagree that the 'Coats, RIGHT NOW, are at least one of the top 3 or 4? Cadets have a way of pulling away in LATE JULY (their shows are usually so dang complex it takes them that long to get the effect scores) and early August. I think we are going to see a top 4 or 5 dog fight this summer. If the 'Coats have the guillons to keep up with the Jones' we might see one really surprising finish. Or, like someone else said, they could end up being a really good 4th or 5th. DW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlamInvert122 Posted June 23, 2006 Share Posted June 23, 2006 but judges told them what was wrong and how to fix it. cadets first time judges never heard it You're missing the point... you can't compare The Cadets first score to anyone else's first score because they happened a week apart. If we really want a true comparison of the two we'll have to wait until they compete on the same field. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom&Phitch Posted June 23, 2006 Share Posted June 23, 2006 people always seem to find a reason why bluecoats aren't for real.. umm... bc its not the end of the season and we dont know if they are or arent. most people act like they are and for all we they or anyone else knows, they can stop progressing and wander around 7th place or so, then again they can place in the top 4, who knows? no one. so for me they wont be legit till Finals night when and where their scorte is announced. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_King Posted June 23, 2006 Share Posted June 23, 2006 If we really want a true comparison of the two we'll have to wait until they compete on the same field. i agree Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.