Fran Haring Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 I'm just seeking clarification. I know...I was just bustin'. Those actually were very good questions. That's an interesting scenario, the whole "security being called" thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reservoir Dog Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 I know...I was just bustin'.Those actually were very good questions. That's an interesting scenario, the whole "security being called" thing. Yes, it IS an interesting scenario-especially when one takes into consideration that the meeting in which the 5 Board members were removed, was conducted through a conference call. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garfield Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 Yes, it IS an interesting scenario-especially when one takes into consideration that the meeting in which the 5 Board members were removed, was conducted through a conference call. HA! LOL! That's hilarious! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff Ream Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 So what's the validity of the information that two gentlemen named "Mark" and "Fred" were the ones that initially stood up to all of this after that meeting? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fran Haring Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 Yes, it IS an interesting scenario-especially when one takes into consideration that the meeting in which the 5 Board members were removed, was conducted through a conference call. I thought there might be something "troll-like" about that whole security thing. Physically removing someone through a phone has to be tough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reservoir Dog Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 I thought there might be something "troll-like" about that whole security thing. Physically removing someone through a phone has to be tough. I was wondering about the logistics of that, myself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRASSO Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 Yes, it IS an interesting scenario-especially when one takes into consideration that the meeting in which the 5 Board members were removed, was conducted through a conference call. Which is of course true as you are referring to the Board Meeting conference call. There is a differnce between removal of board members by vote ,and removal of former board member by security. They are not mutually exclusive, providing it is understood WHICH meeting we are referring too in which security was requested to remove a member. It did happen. If you chose not to believe it, that is your perogative. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reservoir Dog Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 Which is of course true as you are referring to the Board Meeting conference call.There is a differnce between removal of board members by vote ,and removal of former board member by security. They are not mutually exclusive, providing it is understood WHICH meeting we are referring too in which security was requested to remove a member. It did happen. If you chose not to believe it, that is your perogative. I was referring to the meeting in which the 5 Board members were recalled. Which meeting are you referring to? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fran Haring Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 It did happen. If you chose not to believe it, that is your perogative. I won't believe it until I see video of the perp-walk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.