silvertrombone Posted January 21, 2008 Share Posted January 21, 2008 OK, my other thread is kind of getting hijacked, so let's just have it out here. Do you think 2006 Bluecoats should have placed 6th, higher or lower than 6th? Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usmpiano Posted January 21, 2008 Share Posted January 21, 2008 I had them in third. BD should have been down near 8th in my book. Just so many naggy performance issues and frankly an uninteresting show. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CFarley311 Posted January 21, 2008 Share Posted January 21, 2008 I voted above. I'm curious as to the OP's top 6 from '06 and where the Bluecoats should have fit in and why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCImaniac Posted January 21, 2008 Share Posted January 21, 2008 I had them in third.BD should have been down near 8th in my book. Just so many naggy performance issues and frankly an uninteresting show. Do explain your rationale. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pinwiz Posted January 21, 2008 Share Posted January 21, 2008 Bluecoats 2006 or 2007? 2006 was just right, and jumped over Cadets and SCV. They were en fuego at Finals. 2007 had issues. Major issues finals week that other corps didn't have. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DevTrev Posted January 21, 2008 Share Posted January 21, 2008 BD should have been down near 8th in my book. LOL! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lance Posted January 21, 2008 Share Posted January 21, 2008 Coats 06 placed exactly where it should've. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhantomR Posted January 21, 2008 Share Posted January 21, 2008 I had them in third.BD should have been down near 8th in my book. Just so many naggy performance issues and frankly an uninteresting show. I'm glad you were able to spot all those naggy performance issues that somehow managed to elude the judges the entire year. wow. ~>conner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iPlaydaTuba Posted January 21, 2008 Share Posted January 21, 2008 I had them in third.BD should have been down near 8th in my book. Just so many naggy performance issues and frankly an uninteresting show. I completely agree. I saw them a few weeks before finals, and I thought that their performance then was much better than finals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Musicman1084 Posted January 21, 2008 Share Posted January 21, 2008 OK, my other thread is kind of getting hijacked, so let's just have it out here. Do you think 2006 Bluecoats should have placed 6th, higher or lower than 6th?Thanks. I'm confused. Are you thinking of another year when the Bluecoats placed 6th, or are you just giving us these options for a specific reason? You do realize they placed 4th that year, right? I said "higher than 6th" because I feel they placed where they should have placed: 4th place. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.