CrownFan4ever Posted July 16, 2009 Share Posted July 16, 2009 Hi, I have never liked the Cadets choice to use narration in their shows in past years. I do not mind small narration but I do not like big drawn out things! I just wanted to see what you guys think of narration in the Cadets shows and shows in general. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShortAndFast Posted July 16, 2009 Share Posted July 16, 2009 Wow, there's a topic we've never covered here at DCP! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCV Nut Posted July 16, 2009 Share Posted July 16, 2009 One word.... SUCKS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acolli17 Posted July 16, 2009 Share Posted July 16, 2009 Hi, I have never liked the Cadets choice to use narration in their shows in past years. I do not mind small narration but I do not like big drawn out things! I just wanted to see what you guys think of narration in the Cadets shows and shows in general. George Hopkins' argument for it was that he would only use voice when necessary to convey a story/idea/moral. I would say 2006 and 2008 were not the best, but 2005 and 2007 saw great things. I always thought 2007 was the most entertaining because it was basically a big "F U" to the people who didn't like it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chadwick Posted July 16, 2009 Share Posted July 16, 2009 Hi, I have never liked the Cadets choice to use narration in their shows in past years. I do not mind small narration but I do not like big drawn out things! I just wanted to see what you guys think of narration in the Cadets shows and shows in general. If you hadn't just joined yesterday, I was going to ask you what rock you were under... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acolli17 Posted July 16, 2009 Share Posted July 16, 2009 Wow, there's a topic we've never covered here at DCP! It's his first post, give him a break. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt_S Posted July 16, 2009 Share Posted July 16, 2009 If you hadn't just joined yesterday, I was going to ask you what rock you were under... It's like being 'born yesterday' as the saying goes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrownFan4ever Posted July 16, 2009 Author Share Posted July 16, 2009 George Hopkins' argument for it was that he would only use voice when necessary to convey a story/idea/moral. I would say 2006 and 2008 were not the best, but 2005 and 2007 saw great things. I always thought 2007 was the most entertaining because it was basically a big "F U" to the people who didn't like it. yeah i heard that from George Hopkins. I personally loved their 07 show. but their 08 show i got bored watching it. They r in my opinion good enough without it. It is just distracting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acolli17 Posted July 16, 2009 Share Posted July 16, 2009 (edited) yeah i heard that from George Hopkins. I personally loved their 07 show. but their 08 show i got bored watching it. They r in my opinion good enough without it. It is just distracting. Yeah, it's also why they took almost all of it out for this year. They didn't need someone explaning romeo and juliet/west side story/western side story on the field. Edited July 16, 2009 by acolli17 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrownFan4ever Posted July 16, 2009 Author Share Posted July 16, 2009 Wow, there's a topic we've never covered here at DCP! O I am sorry. I looked at some of the posts and didnt see it so I thought i was good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.