Jump to content

Would DCI allow a For-Profit corps?


Recommended Posts

I was thinking about this earlier. Consider this scenario:

A rich oil tycoon that used to march for __________ decides to start his own drum corps. Instead of taking the traditional "This is for the kids" approach, he's all about winning golds at all costs. He buys top of the line equipment, he hires the best horn/drum/guard instructors in the world, and recruits all over the country. He then decides to start paying stipends to the members for joining.

Do you think DCI would let his corps in? Or would DCI deny him? And let's say he gives DCI a buttload of money in donations.

Just want to hear your thoughts and opinions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

As someone with slight experience with for-profit corps, I'd say they would not. DCI's mission (and as relates to their tax-exempt status) is as of a non-profit youth organization - I think they'd have trouble reconciling that with for-profit members.

Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

can't wait to see where this thread goes

there's only man united, there's only one man united........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking about this earlier. Consider this scenario:

A rich oil tycoon that used to march for __________ decides to start his own drum corps. Instead of taking the traditional "This is for the kids" approach, he's all about winning golds at all costs. He buys top of the line equipment, he hires the best horn/drum/guard instructors in the world, and recruits all over the country. He then decides to start paying stipends to the members for joining.

Do you think DCI would let his corps in? Or would DCI deny him? And let's say he gives DCI a buttload of money in donations.

Just want to hear your thoughts and opinions.

Exactly how is this scenario "for-profit". I don't see a corps like this generating any profit. Except for paying the members, hasn't this already been done?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly how is this scenario "for-profit". I don't see a corps like this generating any profit. Except for paying the members, hasn't this already been done?
uh-oh, here we go!!! This thread should turn into a real BLAST.... Edited by VOReason
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly how is this scenario "for-profit". I don't see a corps like this generating any profit. Except for paying the members, hasn't this already been done?

Yeah I agree This would be a privately sponsored professional Corps. I mean no profit just funded.

Edited by Perry S
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. A corps like that goes counter to what DCI is supposed to be for. Besides, they'd probably get little to no fan support anyways because they're basically buying the championship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

whether paying members or members paying, they still have to go through the same ordeal as every other corps out there in order to accomplish a championship title.

However, I don't see such a corps to be possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking about this earlier. Consider this scenario:

A rich oil tycoon that used to march for __________ decides to start his own drum corps. Instead of taking the traditional "This is for the kids" approach, he's all about winning golds at all costs. He buys top of the line equipment, he hires the best horn/drum/guard instructors in the world, and recruits all over the country. He then decides to start paying stipends to the members for joining.

Do you think DCI would let his corps in? Or would DCI deny him? And let's say he gives DCI a buttload of money in donations.

Just want to hear your thoughts and opinions.

Sure they can be a part of the activity.

There is nothing illegal about a non-profit corporation paying employees, contractors, etc. Most corps (and DCI itself) pays employees right now. What's the difference whether they are performing members, a secretary, bus driver or a director; there is no difference. Whether anyone agrees with the senario that's a different thing, but it's legal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure they can be a part of the activity.

There is nothing illegal about a non-profit corporation paying employees, contractors, etc. Most corps (and DCI itself) pays employees right now. What's the difference whether they are performing members, a secretary, bus driver or a director; there is no difference. Whether anyone agrees with the senario that's a different thing, but it's legal.

I'd like to see this happen... maybe ALL drum corps should be "for-proft." It would be interesting to see how a drum corps would create a product that a wider market would actually pay to see.

Right now, the fan base is essentially participants, their supports, and a few fans who still go to shows thinking this might be the year they aren't disappointed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...