KakkoiiOtaku Posted August 19, 2010 Share Posted August 19, 2010 I am talking about the high cam view here. Just the high cam view. And the DVDs have been substituted for several years now at the whim of the production folks. They want the best performance reflected in the DVDs/videos. This is a common practice.What I am asking about is RIGHT NOW. At this moment, I can go to FN and choose the High Cam view of Crown. It's not pretty. Not Ryan's fall itself, but his efforts to get back up. It's just tough to watch. Good point. Look at Crown 2007. On the CD, Kelly fracked (a small frack) her solo in the ballad, but on the video, it's perfect. Guess they just replaced that audio. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SFZFAN Posted August 19, 2010 Share Posted August 19, 2010 Good point. Look at Crown 2007. On the CD, Kelly fracked (a small frack) her solo in the ballad, but on the video, it's perfect. Guess they just replaced that audio. I personally think DCI should ask the injured member if he wants the videos edited or not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gliderpilot Posted August 19, 2010 Share Posted August 19, 2010 I personally think DCI should ask the injured member if he wants the videos edited or not. yup. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g0at Posted August 19, 2010 Share Posted August 19, 2010 yeah...agreed.Also, Regiment's Flugel player nailed it finals night, but had a couple of small issues during semis. I hope they use the finals night performance for him. So for those listening out there in Fan Network/DVD/BlueRay land.... Crown = semis performance Regiment = finals performance Um... Why would they put anything other than the finals performance for regiment? Lol, just seems weird. I could list mistakes that were made in every other corps for semis. Also, DCI can edit in the semi performance during the fall section and edit then switch right back for the rest of the show. It doesn't have to be all or none. Blurring out sections of the show or adjusting the frame would just look terrible. There may be camera angles that would be suitable as well. They could be sneaky with the way they select the multi-cam angles and avoid editing all together. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bdevil08 Posted August 19, 2010 Share Posted August 19, 2010 I personally think DCI should ask the injured member if he wants the videos edited or not. Agreed. It is extremely difficult to watch. I almost got physically sick in the stands replaying what I saw in my head. I think it should ultimately be something the editors and Ryan decide. With the limited experience I have with editing, it wouldn't be extremely hard to replace the high cam with the semi's performance and any other necessary shots. As long as the tempos are very close and the cameras are calibrated the same way night to night, it shouldn't really be noticeable. Post production can do wonders. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
84BDsop Posted August 19, 2010 Share Posted August 19, 2010 Um... Why would they put anything other than the finals performance for regiment? Not a new idea....the 83 record of SCV was semi's not finals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g0at Posted August 19, 2010 Share Posted August 19, 2010 Not a new idea....the 83 record of SCV was semi's not finals. I know that... But, if the semis was worse than finals--- why worry that they won't select the finals performance? Kinda weird.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffe77 Posted August 19, 2010 Share Posted August 19, 2010 (edited) If they can replace the footage of the BD mello player that missed a step-off in 2007 on finals night (multi-cam), they will do the same for Crown 2010. And I am sure they will do that for the high cam also. I'm sure there's no need to worry, except on FN for now. In this case yes, find a different angle, however I'm still bothered about DCI changing the BD 07 footage. 1993 had numerous falls, especially the Cavies. No editing done. That was the final performance on the Video, Broadcast and DVD. Let's not try to advocate for this activity to be more mainstream and then when an imperfection occurs, let's erase it from History. You don't see that in other competitive idioms. SCV had some minor solo miscues 1989, no change in the Final Cut. Edited August 19, 2010 by Jeffe77 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
84BDsop Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 In this case yes, find a different angle, however I'm still bothered about DCI changing the BD 07 footage. 1993 had numerous falls, especially the Cavies. No editing done. That was the final performance on the Video, Broadcast and DVD. Let's not try to advocate for this activity to be more mainstream and then when an imperfection occurs, let's erase it from History. You don't see that in other competitive idioms. SCV had some minor solo miscues 1989, no change in the Final Cut. I believe the end decision rests with the corps themselves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liahona Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 In this case yes, find a different angle, however I'm still bothered about DCI changing the BD 07 footage. 1993 had numerous falls, especially the Cavies. No editing done. That was the final performance on the Video, Broadcast and DVD. Let's not try to advocate for this activity to be more mainstream and then when an imperfection occurs, let's erase it from History. You don't see that in other competitive idioms. SCV had some minor solo miscues 1989, no change in the Final Cut. This! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.