Jump to content

Sound Board and Front Boundary Rules Pass


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 183
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

What difference does it make?

I don't know that it does. I'm merely trying to gauge whether those who are offended are offended more by the use of amps or by their use, potentially, by a staff member.

Someone said it was a choice between evils. Which is the lesser evil in your view?

HH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Jeff... preprogrammed sounds are illegal. No one's going to be using them. It's pretty obvious when someone is using samples.

2. Half of the replies on here are just anti-amplification. That's not the point. The point is: If we are going to use amps, we need to use them correctly.

3. It's not like the staff member is some big mix-master in control over the entire drum corps. This is where people are over reacting. The kids behind the speakers cannot tell what's coming out of the speakers. This is why you wouldn't make someone mix from behind the speakers. All the staff person would be doing is adjusting for proper balance. Would you ask a theatre group to mix from the stage? A rock band? How about an outdoor amplified symphony? It would sound awful.

Everyone is forgetting one simple thing. SOUND Current drum corps members are unbelievably talented and they care about the best quality sound. Someone has to be IN FRONT of the speakers PERIOD.

A couple more notes:

**Soundchecks are not enough. Just because there is sound coming out of the speakers before you start the show doesn't mean it's going to balance with everything else

**Balance should be reflected in score. If the amps are unbalanced and sound bad, the judges should take notice. Just because we are now allowing amplification doesn't mean that we should allow it to sound awful. (Like last year)

**Feedback should be just as unacceptable as a cracked note. It should also reflect in the GE score.

Dallas

Former Drum Corps Member

Audio Mixer - Fox & G4 Television Los Angeles

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yet Mike, so many people have publically disagreed with you. and if the sound WAS better, then why the need for this rule change?

I agree with him.

YAY MIKE!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was once actually. It was acoustic brass and percussion. Sounded pretty good every night.

:blink::blink::bleah::huh::lol::blink::blink::bleah::huh::lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems to me the best way to "balance the mix" is to do away with the amps all together and tell the kids to practice more

:blink::blink::bleah::huh::lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think a lot of people would agree that the biggest problem is the implications of this rule and the future impact on the activity. Whats to keep from adding non members to various aspects of the performance if we start doing this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Jeff... preprogrammed sounds are illegal. No one's going to be using them. It's pretty obvious when someone is using samples.

2. Half of the replies on here are just anti-amplification. That's not the point. The point is: If we are going to use amps, we need to use them correctly.

3. It's not like the staff member is some big mix-master in control over the entire drum corps. This is where people are over reacting. The kids behind the speakers cannot tell what's coming out of the speakers. This is why you wouldn't make someone mix from behind the speakers. All the staff person would be doing is adjusting for proper balance. Would you ask a theatre group to mix from the stage? A rock band? How about an outdoor amplified symphony? It would sound awful.

Everyone is forgetting one simple thing. SOUND Current drum corps members are unbelievably talented and they care about the best quality sound. Someone has to be IN FRONT of the speakers PERIOD.

A couple more notes:

**Soundchecks are not enough. Just because there is sound coming out of the speakers before you start the show doesn't mean it's going to balance with everything else

**Balance should be reflected in score. If the amps are unbalanced and sound bad, the judges should take notice. Just because we are now allowing amplification doesn't mean that we should allow it to sound awful. (Like last year)

**Feedback should be just as unacceptable as a cracked note. It should also reflect in the GE score.

Dallas

Former Drum Corps Member

Audio Mixer - Fox & G4 Television Los Angeles

If the judges are giving and denying credit based on the balance in the ensemble area, the fact that a staff member is controlling at least some of that balance means the decisions that staff member makes and the direct action he/she takes DURING THE PERFORMANCE is affecting the score.

I don't think that should be allowed.

Edited by shawn craig
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because the adjustments are not impacting the actual production of the sounds of the members, yes, I have no issue with this. In fact, it will help what is actually being played come across even better if there is some sort of issue with the amps. It doesn't change the physical performance by the members at all.

DCI can do no wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...