Matt_S Posted June 28, 2007 Share Posted June 28, 2007 Here's a thread, in a format most will recognize from the Bored Forums. The question is "What's more impressive?" Everyone who responds will make their pick, then provide another situation for the next person to respond to. For example, if I say "What's more impressive, the Cavaliers 99.15 in 2002 or the Cadets 99.15 in 2005?", the next person to respond would make their pick, explaining why, then give a question for the next person to answer. So... What's more impressive, the Cavaliers 99.15 in 2002 or the Cadets 99.15 in 2005? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Galen Posted June 28, 2007 Share Posted June 28, 2007 Cavies, esp. considering how dirty their guard was on finals night. More impressive- the '96 tie, the '99 tie or the '00 tie? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meaghatron Posted June 28, 2007 Share Posted June 28, 2007 The '96 tie, because it gave PR their first title. What is more impressive, the narration in '07 Cadets or in '06 Cadets? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Galen Posted June 28, 2007 Share Posted June 28, 2007 Neither! :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Musicman1084 Posted June 28, 2007 Share Posted June 28, 2007 The '96 tie - Phantom comes all the way from 4th in Quarters. What's more impressive: The way the Troopers have started off their return to competition, or the way the Blue Stars started off their return to Division 1? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jwillis35 Posted June 28, 2007 Share Posted June 28, 2007 (edited) Cavies, esp. considering how dirty their guard was on finals night.More impressive- the '96 tie, the '99 tie or the '00 tie? Sorry if I am responding to this after someone else did. The tie in 1996 was most impressive. Reason: in 1999 and 2000, there will clearly two corps who could have won the title. While the Blue Devils had the lead most of the season in 1999, no one doubted that SCV could win. Same in 2000. Cadets were undefeated, but Cavaliers had also conquered the competition most of that summer. In 1996, Phantom was not really in the equation, although they were incredibly good and had started to make a run. But most figured it was down to BD and Cadets, and many felt that had Cadets not taken time off for the Olympics that they might have won. For Phantom to rise to the occasion and go from 4th in quarters to 1st at Finals is the stuff of legends. JW What is more impressive: Garfield's three-peat from 1983 - 85 or the Cavaliers' from 2000 - 2002? Edited June 28, 2007 by jwillis35 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sburstall Posted June 28, 2007 Share Posted June 28, 2007 The '96 tie - Phantom comes all the way from 4th in Quarters.What's more impressive: The way the Troopers have started off their return to competition, or the way the Blue Stars started off their return to Division 1? The return of Troopers (actually I'm impressed by both...but could only choose one. :( ) What's more impressive: '83 Garfield with thier first DCI title or '96 Phantom's first DCI title? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shawn craig Posted June 28, 2007 Share Posted June 28, 2007 The '96 tie - Phantom comes all the way from 4th in Quarters.What's more impressive: The way the Troopers have started off their return to competition, or the way the Blue Stars started off their return to Division 1? The Troopers. They came so close to not being and to make such a come back with an almost full corps in just one year is amazing. Love Blue Stars, but they had been building and planning on a return over time. Glad both are doing well Do you prefer a guard that is dirty but lots of "emotional movement" or a guard with lots of crisp clean spinning? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jwillis35 Posted June 28, 2007 Share Posted June 28, 2007 The '96 tie - Phantom comes all the way from 4th in Quarters.What's more impressive: The way the Troopers have started off their return to competition, or the way the Blue Stars started off their return to Division 1? Yeah, don't know that I can only choose one here. I say this is a push. Both organizations have come back in good shape, very impressive on the field, doing well in recruiting, and they are working hard at fund-raising. They are both to be applauded. I will give the edge to Troopers for having the better Bingo Hall. :) What is more impressive: The brass line of the 1990 Dutch Boy or the 1979 Guardsmen? This is for those who have been around a while. JW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt_S Posted June 28, 2007 Author Share Posted June 28, 2007 What is more impressive: Garfield's three-peat from 1983 - 85 or the Cavaliers' from 2000 - 2002? I love Cavaliers, but... Garfield revolutionized the activity with their shows in the early 80's, while the Cavaliers haven't yet had the test of time. Also, those three titles were the Cadets first three championships in the DCI era. I think it's impressive to come storming through the ranks, then stay on top. What's the more impressive second place finish, BD '84, SCV '87, Star '93, or BD '04? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.