sardomus Posted July 24, 2005 Share Posted July 24, 2005 Now that we've all heard the BD show, I thought I'd help out all those anti-narration people out, by starting this thread. Here, you can all post your rants about their narration... I just assume that you would all be 20 times as infuriated by BD, because there's so much more narration. Or is their 11-minute narration ok, because they aren't the Cadets? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WLCBonr04 Posted July 24, 2005 Share Posted July 24, 2005 Now that we've all heard the BD show, I thought I'd help out all those anti-narration people out, by starting this thread. Here, you can all post your rants about their narration...I just assume that you would all be 20 times as infuriated by BD, because there's so much more narration. Or is their 11-minute narration ok, because they aren't the Cadets? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> **tiptoes toward the door** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Einstein On The Beach Posted July 24, 2005 Share Posted July 24, 2005 Your post doesn't make much sense, but I'll continue to allow you to foam at the mouth over nothing. Actually, alot of the anti-amp people have been saying, "You know, I actually like BD's narration!" You're one of the few people I've heard complain, and it's definitely not a joke like the amped stuff last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lance Posted July 24, 2005 Share Posted July 24, 2005 Closing soon. Move along. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skajerk Posted July 24, 2005 Share Posted July 24, 2005 Okay, like I said WEEKS AGO when this was talked about BEFORE they went to Europe. I don't like it. But, thanks for taking the high road and making the pro-amp people look like little angels.[/sarcasm] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sardomus Posted July 24, 2005 Author Share Posted July 24, 2005 (edited) Actually, alot of the anti-amp people have been saying, "You know, I actually like BD's narration!" <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Sorry, you missed my sarcasm. That's what I meant. Apparently, from what I've read, Cadets narration=bad, BD narration=good. Now that I hear it, I'm not sure why. BTW- I'm not anti-amp or anti-narration (edited: because I can't spell after such a stress-filled evening) Edited July 24, 2005 by sardomus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QuentinTarantino Posted July 24, 2005 Share Posted July 24, 2005 I am trying to keep an open mind regarding the use of amplified voice. However, I was extremely displeased with the Blue Devils Kalamazoo performance. Although the speaker had a nice voice, I found the narration to be distracting, boring and redundant. It is not funny nor does it give the audience any information that is not already being displayed by the color guard. It is far worst than any of the amped stuff last year. QT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCImonkey Posted July 24, 2005 Share Posted July 24, 2005 ONE THOUUUUUUUSSAAANNNND HOURS!!!!!! :P YOWZA!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarVoyager Posted July 24, 2005 Share Posted July 24, 2005 It's terrible. Plain and simple. No better than Cadets. Although BD's narration fits with the theme better than The Cadets, it still detracts from their show. Narrations in BOTH shows need to go. Period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCImonkey Posted July 24, 2005 Share Posted July 24, 2005 I liked Seattle's the least..... must be the "presentation" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts