GMichael1230 Posted August 24, 2005 Share Posted August 24, 2005 So, another thread has got me thinking, in the past thirty three years of judged nationals has there been a corps judged champion that you might not agree with ? Not that you dont like them ? DId you feel another corps clearly, without a doubt, thats the key here 'Clearly without a doubt' out performed the winner and should have been the champion ?? Please, keep it civil, respectful and no one word answers, if you name a corps, try and give a reason why you feel this way...could lead to some interesting discussion. Remember, this isnt to bash any corps, or their accomplishments, dont just pick a corps cause you like them. Its about the performance that night. ......GO ! ~G~ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCIAGEOUT Posted August 24, 2005 Share Posted August 24, 2005 I thought Cavies should have won in 1990 and Cadets in 1992 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PR_ducky Posted August 24, 2005 Share Posted August 24, 2005 OK ~G~ I knew as soon as I said that in the last thread it was a mistake, but here it goes. and PLEASE people, remember this is JUST MY OPINION (although I know I am not alone on these as all were extremely hotly debated at the time, and in the few years after they occurred) One last thing. I really think that if you were not actually there at finals, and are just judging off video you might want to avoid this topic, we all know its just not the same. With that said, here is what I think. I was at finals from 1986-1996. 86-90 as a member, 91-96 as staff. 1986 - BD, absolutely, the best and they deserved to win. 1987 - Cadets, controversial, beat SCV by .1 but in my opinion deserved the win 1988 - Madison won, but in my (and alot of peoples opinion) SCV should have won. If you have never seen SCV 88 it was a better show than 89 1989 - SCV won, but at the time, and even still, a lot of people though Regiment should have. And please don't give me the "they got the most votes in the fan poll argument". They were better in 88 and my theory on the votes thing is that a lot of HS kids just saw Phantom of the Opera in the movie theatre and wanted to see SCV. They were awesome in 89, but better in 88 and 1989 was Regiments peak between 79 and 96. 1990 - Cadets won, and I thought deserved it. Some would argue for Cavaliers. 1991 - Star won and deserved it hands down 1992 - Cavaliers won and deserved it. 1993 - Cadets won, but MANY would argue for Star that year. 50/50 in my opinion 1994 - BD won and was by far the best. 1995 - Cavaliers won, but I prefered BD who was undefeated going into finals week. In my defense I didn't see either of them live finals night. 1996 - PR and BD. As off the wall as it sounds I honestly think they deserved to Tie. Both were great for different reasons. So there ya go. and remember, THIS IS JUST MY OPINION. I will say that some of these opinions though were widely held at the time they occured, and in the next few years, but time fades such things. Anyone agree with any of these? None of them? Keep it nice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
^Michael^ Posted August 24, 2005 Share Posted August 24, 2005 I think '89 could have gone either way between Phantom and SCV. Actually, over the years, I've begun leaning toward giving the nod to Phantom. In '74, I think that Kingsmen could have won again, but that's probably just emotional favoritism talking.... (one of my absolute favorite all time shows) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluecoats88 Posted August 24, 2005 Share Posted August 24, 2005 Well I was involved in the Activity since 1982 and here's my thoughts. 1982 - BD Hands down the Winner 1983 - Cadets (I didn't see more than one show that year so have no differing opinion) 1984 - Cadets (I watched top 5 from right by the press box and though BD should have won) 1985 - Cadets (they were the clear winner) 1986 - BD (nobody could touch them) 1987 - Cadets (definately won, but if SCV didn't have the tear at the begining I woulda given it to them) 1988 - Madison (I thought SCV and maybe even BD) 1989 - SCV (didn't go to finals but thought PR had the show that year) 1990 - Cadets (I liked Cavies but thought Cadets won on finals night) 1991 - Star Hands Down 1992 - Cavies Cavies Came to play on finals night 1993 - Cadets ( it was a toss up but I thought Cadets had the whole package) 1994 - BD again Hands Down 1995 - Cavies had the whole package that year 1996 - PR & BD (Didn't see finals, but at Allentown I thought PR had the best show of the year) 1997 - 1998 Didn't go to finals but thought the scoring seemed right 1999 - Woulda given it to SCV becuase I Personally prefered their show, but thought BD won on finals night. 2000 - Toss up between the two winners, but my brother thought Cavies had won. 2001-2003 Didn't go to finals and in 2002 didn't see all corps, but I hear Cavies were on in 01 & 02, and I prefered BD in 03. 2004 - Cavies were clearly the winner during finals week 2005 - Cadets were clearly the winner during finals week These are just my thoughts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glory Posted August 24, 2005 Share Posted August 24, 2005 I'm only going to offer my opinion for the championships I actually attended. I agree that judging from video/DVD isn't the same. Since 1990, I think the judges have correctly picked the "best" corps on the field for the championship. It hasn't necessarily been the corps I liked best on Saturday night, but I'll willingly concede the judges rewarded the best performance. HH Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GMichael1230 Posted August 24, 2005 Author Share Posted August 24, 2005 Ah yes "PR" , I started this with you in mind, and no, nobody should be offended. My take : I will start with 79 since thats the first finals I saw live and it wouldnt be fair to go back further 79 - Loved PR but BD deserved the win. 80 - Loved 27th, but BD deserved the win 81 - Loved BD but understand now that drums cost them the title, so, I guess SCV deserved the win. 82 - Blue Devils - no contest 83 - Garfield deserved the win 84 - Sorry, Sam, "any other year" but Garfield show was just too strong so, Garfield deserved the win. 85 - Horns and drums but no title, BD was good, but Garfield deserved the win 86 - Blue Devils - no contest 87 - Sorry, SCV deserved the win Heres the first I dont agree with 88 - Ok, going into nats undefeated and the Blue Devils wind up third ?? They just didnt get the credit they deserved for the difficulty they really had in their show. While some really smart people explained to me why Scouts won ! And I tend to agree on a good day, The Blue Devils were robbed of their title in 1988, notice how the experimental performance order died, real quick ?Ok, so this is two I dont agree with. 89 - Loved Phantom, however, SCV had that little extra something to stay ahead of PR, I call it GE, my pal Jeff Ream, blames PR's drum line. 90 - All six were championship caliber, Cadets had the most balanced show, I agree, Cadets deserved the win. 91 - Star, no contest. 92 - I still cant understand what put Cavies over Star ? Finals night performance was not as emotional as Semis, somewhat sloppy, and kinda flat. Star was flawless, brass, visual, I dont get it ?? Star deserved the win.ok thats three I dont agree with 93 - Loved Star, Loved Cadets, I so can see why Cadets won, they deserved the win 94 - Blue Devils, no contest 95 - BD, again, undefeated til nats, wind up third. I still feel they shoulda won in my heart, but......imo, Cavies deserved the win. 96 - BD, PR....deserved the win. 97 - Blue Devils, deserved the win, just too clean to be overtaken. 98 - Cadets, no contest 99 - BD/SCV a tie that was actually deserved. 00 - Just troubling all around, both corps had something over the other, so I guess the tie was valid, both deserved the win. 01 - Cavies deserved the win, BD was cleaner though 02 - Cavies deserved the win 03 - BD deserved the win 04 - So close, but Cavies were more complete 05 - Phantom was my favorite, by far..........but...........yes, Cadets did deserve the win. So, from 79 - 05, I have had only three opportunities to gripe, maybe five, but I can understand why in two occasions the corps I thought were better didnt win...... ~G~ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
azscvfan Posted August 24, 2005 Share Posted August 24, 2005 By doing the finals that I have been to... There are only 2 I can say I disagree with. (only been to 98, 99, 00, 04 but I have my tickets for Madison) 99 BD/SCV tie - I love SCV... but after there performance on Finals night, I thought BD would have won... I was so nervous. However, if you take their encore performance as if it was their finals performance, then hands down they were better. I also spoke with someone from their staff that year (was a high school vis guy of mine) and he would say the same thing. 00 Cavies/Cadets tie - I think Cavies should have won alone All the rest: Cadets 98, Cavies 04 are truly the winners. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhantomR Posted August 24, 2005 Share Posted August 24, 2005 well, the ones I REALLY dont agree with are as follows. 1989... Phantom deserved it, but SCV was still amazing 1996... Phantom beat Blue Devils no questions asked. 1999... SCV won, not tie, no questions. 2000... Cavies deserved it 2004... I though BD had it.. oh well. ~>conner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maestro767 Posted August 24, 2005 Share Posted August 24, 2005 2004... I though BD had it.. oh well.~>conner <{POST_SNAPBACK}> During the second half of the season I knew Cavies were going to pull ahead of BD... I liked BD a lot but Cavies were just improving at a better rate. That said, seeing/listening to them now I can really see how BD could have won. Both had excellent shows and executed them really well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.