Jump to content

Leveling the playing field


Recommended Posts

1374087601[/url]' post='3288033']

So, are you saying a member could possibly be assigned a new corps each year according to the draw? If so, then NO!!!

Part of the corps experience (according to my kids) is spending the summer with your corps "family". This would destroy these relationships just for the sake of what....trying to level the playing field?

Nope, not a good idea!

JKT90: And yes, sometimes going on tour with your friends can make up for bad busses, banged up equipment, and sub par food, cause you're all in it together.

Yes, I agree with that. My point is, it would slowly level the field if corps had more money, In general the overall quality of the corps would rise because when you have nice things and a top notch staff people wouldn't necessarily go get experience at one corps then move on to a top corps...they would stay, which would allow that corps to raise their talent level, then you could get into a feeder corps program and have your own farm system happening. If corps could figure out how to bring in more revenue that would solve a lot of their problems. Star had the grant, the buses and the refueling station, and when we toured with them in 90, we were envious of their bus, food truck and just generally having everything better than we did...which is the main reason I went there in 91, (unfortunately wasn't able to go on tour, in their opener you can still the tenor hole until the 4th guy from the pit hooks in with them). There stuff was much nicer than Spirit's, and a main reason my buddy who went to JSU with me did not march Spirit but rather drove from Alabama to Indiana for three years...more money = better everything.

Edited by JKT90
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll put it very bluntly:

no way in hell

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, I think the OP acknowledged that this was an idea that would never happen, but these are the kind of questions that can actually generate interesting discussions.

How do you build parity in the activity? Is it just a matter of dollars and cents? How about Corps reputation or staff reputation?

What if next year Pioneer announced they had an all-star design team and staff, there was no tuition and they would be serving the finest food? How long would it take for them to climb to the upper echelons?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1374083765[/url]' post='3287995']

As a follow-on to TerriTroops Move in idea, here is a far more radical suggestion to leveling the playing field:

All prospective members apply to DCI, and DCI randomly assigns the to individual units. Corps would draw numbers for each section annually - one year, Phantom might get the first mello, Pioneer the second, all the way doen until the last mello is assigned.

Also, there is one, universal set of 'dues' - everyone pays the same.

Transportion to rehearsals would nee to be worked out.

I understand this has about as much a chance as Hopkins pushing a rule for g v/r bugles only; not to mention it is a rather Soviet approach. But, how would Pioneer score against Crown if they were both the same size and with roughly equal talent levels of the members?

With all due respect, this is a really bad idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

these are independent organizations - no communism/socialism in drum corps :thumbdown:

Really? Are the corps members each negotiating for the price of each meal, bed, and bus seat each day on tour? Do they pay for maintenance on their instruments or for cleaning their uniforms? Or do they pay a fee and share food, transportation, and upkeep costs throughout the season via a centralized power structure that makes all decisions for them? :rolleyes:

Edited by skywhopper
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, I think the OP acknowledged that this was an idea that would never happen, but these are the kind of questions that can actually generate interesting discussions.

How do you build parity in the activity? Is it just a matter of dollars and cents? How about Corps reputation or staff reputation?

What if next year Pioneer announced they had an all-star design team and staff, there was no tuition and they would be serving the finest food? How long would it take for them to climb to the upper echelons?

It's still Milwaukee, however.

I don't mean to be snarky, but there are only so many world class phenomanally talented performers the level of the top 3 or 4 shows who can both play AND move at that phenomenal level. Family situations, educational/college tuitions, and other factors would have to be equalized for any real move in the number of World Class units at this level to increase. It's not just a drum corps/DCI thing.

Even BITD when DCI had almost 100 corps competing, most were at the Div. 2 and 3 levels. And before that, when corps were 1/3 the size of present corps memberships, there were only so many nationally ranked powerhouses.

Edited by drilltech1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a follow-on to TerriTroops Move in idea, here is a far more radical suggestion to leveling the playing field:

All prospective members apply to DCI, and DCI randomly assigns the to individual units. Corps would draw numbers for each section annually - one year, Phantom might get the first mello, Pioneer the second, all the way doen until the last mello is assigned.

Also, there is one, universal set of 'dues' - everyone pays the same.

Transportion to rehearsals would nee to be worked out.

I understand this has about as much a chance as Hopkins pushing a rule for g v/r bugles only; not to mention it is a rather Soviet approach. But, how would Pioneer score against Crown if they were both the same size and with roughly equal talent levels of the members?

This wouldn't and shouldn't work. It is pure Egalitarianism and a form of Marxist philosophy. In a manner of speaking,

what we have now is a level playing field, in that an individual has equality of opportunity - not outcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a follow-on to TerriTroops Move in idea, here is a far more radical suggestion to leveling the playing field:

All prospective members apply to DCI, and DCI randomly assigns the to individual units. Corps would draw numbers for each section annually - one year, Phantom might get the first mello, Pioneer the second, all the way doen until the last mello is assigned.

Also, there is one, universal set of 'dues' - everyone pays the same.

Transportion to rehearsals would nee to be worked out.

I understand this has about as much a chance as Hopkins pushing a rule for g v/r bugles only; not to mention it is a rather Soviet approach. But, how would Pioneer score against Crown if they were both the same size and with roughly equal talent levels of the members?

I don't believe a level playing field has ever moved anyone to become "Great"...

Just don't see it - the only level playing field they get is in a domed stadium.

The rest they work for. Like life.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...