Jump to content

Shows that you wish made finals


Recommended Posts

On 9/30/2017 at 1:58 AM, Stu said:

A plausable reason: If you knew you were not going to medal or win, but you also believed that you were still safely in the top 12 and you thought all the material you created needed to be presented, a small penilty for bring over the time limit was not that big of a deal. However sometimes, like in this case, it occasionally backfired.

That's a good point.  "Hey, we're in... don't worry about it."

Oops.  :tongue:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, GUARDLING said:

A reason yes, in the case with cadets no.

Also a good point.  LOL.  From what I recall, Cadets were not what would be considered a slam dunk for a top 7 or 8 spot that year... so it wasn't like they went in to DCI prelims overconfident or anything.

These timing issues could be costly back then.  A DCA corps lost that circuit's championship one year... ironically, the same year as the Cadets' penalty issue  (1972)...  due to a one-point timing penalty.

That first DCI championship.... I wasn't there, but It seems like everything... the title, the finalist spots and placements... were totally up for grabs.  For one example, Des Plaines Vanguard finished well back of the Kilties at the World Open the first weekend of August that summer... but beat the Kilties two weeks later at DCI Finals. 

Edited by Fran Haring
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Stu said:

Since you know for certain that is a No, then please elighten us on the 'real' reason in 'this' particular case.

The staff just kept diddling around with the show all the way from Garfield to Wisconsin. Adding this and that...it was a bit chaotic really. We were not ever going to be in the top level, so it was not complacency, that is for sure. I think things just got away from the staff, as great as they were. The day after...they all disappeared.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Stu said:

Since you know for certain that is a No, then please elighten us on the 'real' reason in 'this' particular case.

Naw if Mike D or others here from that time want to  they could..but as I did say earlier much more to that story like often bitd.Didnt disregard your comment which could be very true in many cases just not this one.

Edited by GUARDLING
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MikeD said:

 We were not ever going to be in the top level

So instead of thinking the penility would not put you out of top 12, the situation was that you were never going to be in the top 12 anyway, therefore the overtime penility really made no difference at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, GUARDLING said:

Don't think he said that...lol

Remember... this is Stu.

By the time this is done, he'll want a detailed list of what the staff members ate that summer, to see if their diet had any connection to whatever incorrect decisions they made regarding the length of the Cadets' show.  :8_laughing:

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...