Jump to content

Visual proficiency


Recommended Posts

Back in the 80s when my high school pulled in DCI staff to design and clean, we had TONS of basics aimed at perfecting this stuff. It's everything from how you move your feet to how your body is angled and the line you take as you approach your dot for a set. It was also all the arm motions, foot miming, and motions we had built into the show through the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Visual Proficiency is essentially an execution caption in the Visual show. ( as opposed to the Show Design captions like GE ). Its how the marchers execute the visual moves provided to them. Things like technique, proper ( or improper ) spacing, intervals, cover, uniformity, feet, body, instrument positioning ( not as vital anymore ) arriving at position in proper timing, and at exact spot required under the design, proper head of body positioning as required,,.. if the visual routine in a set calls for it, there needs to be complete uniformity in the execution of the set, instruments need to come up and down in complete harmony and uniformity if the drill calls for it ( BD excels in this most years, imo). If the Corps is required to be running, they need to be in uniform step during the running ( its still on the sheets, but lots of even the top Corps show out of steps in the running in my observations ), there should be no " drifting " in movements from one set to the other, ie if it calls for straight marching, the marcher should not wobble in movement from left to right in getting into the position. Once a marcher hits a definate spot, they are not to move unless the visual calls for it. When the visual calls for individual ad libbing by MM's, once that sequence ends, they must return efficiently and uniformly in complete harmony with the others and then into that next required sequence. Corps have different techniques in marching style, ie heel to toe, more pronounced with SCV, than right foot step offs with Cadets, and so forth. These are fine, provided there is uniformity in its execution.

What separates the top performing Corps in this caption with lower executing corps in this caption, is the easily noticeable difference in the spacing intervals, the already mentioned incorrect " drifting " by some MM's, and the improper feet, cover, distance, spacing irregularities, etc. I could mention quite a few other more subtle things the Vis. Prof. judges are looking at, but these are the most common ones anyway.

This is a good definition...

for 1980 :ninja:

The caption encompasses quite a bit more now :-) Most importantly it includes the guard!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a good definition...

for 1980 :ninja:

The caption encompasses quite a bit more now :-) Most importantly it includes the guard!

Obnoxious

All that still matters, or at least it is supposd to.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

shouldn't surprise anyone that it includes the guard... seems like almost every caption on the sheet includes the guard...

Explains a bit of BD's competitive dominance for the past 7-8 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

shouldn't surprise anyone that it includes the guard... seems like almost every caption on the sheet includes the guard...

Yes. Guard marchers count more on the current DCI sheets than Brass marchers, Percussion marchers. Guard marchers play no musical instruments when they are judged in the visual movements. There are upwards of 72-80 Brass Marchers, double that of the size of Guards ( 30-42). Captions however make no allotments for the disparity in the size of the sections. DCI is primarily a Visual driven activity on the sheets too.. A good example if this in real world terms :...Crown finished 6th in Percussion at Finals in 2013, but won a DCI Title for themselves. Would it have been possible to win that Title if they were 6th in Guard or Vis. Prof, but 2nd in Percussion ? No. Not a snowballs chance in Dante's Inferno.

Edited by BRASSO
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obnoxious

All that still matters, or at least it is supposd to.

Not obnoxious. The poster's definition comprised only a small subset of the caption.

shouldn't surprise anyone that it includes the guard... seems like almost every caption on the sheet includes the guard...

well considering they comprise approx 1/3 of the performers moving on the field, it makes a lot of sense to include their efforts in the caption!

visual proficiency is evaluated in both

Content:

  • depth of form body equipment responsibiities
  • simultaneous responsibiliites
  • use of expressive components
  • changes in meter, pulse, tempo

Achievement

  • demonstration of training
  • demonstration of expressive quallities
  • clarity, timing, articulation of body, form, equipment
  • precision with respect to challenge
  • overal environmental challenges
  • concentration, stamina, and recovery
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. Guard marchers count more on the current DCI sheets than Brass marchers, Percussion marchers. Guard marchers play no musical instruments when they are judged in the visual movements. There are upwards of 72-80 Brass Marchers, double that of the size of Guards ( 30-42). Captions however make no allotments for the disparity in the size of the sections. DCI is primarily a Visual driven activity on the sheets too.. A good example if this in real world terms :...Crown finished 6th in Percussion at Finals in 2013, but won a DCI Title for themselves. Would it have been possible to win that Title if they were 6th in Guard or Vis. Prof, but 2nd in Percussion ? No. Not a snowballs chance in Dante's Inferno.

Actually this is not the case.

Crown's guard was winning their caption from the start of the season. But their contribution didn't stop the judges from putting programs with weaker guards above them for more than half the season.

Oops!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Explains a bit of BD's competitive dominance for the past 7-8 years.

Not really. Their marching musicians have a broader vocabulary and greater excellence than nearly every other corps. Their guard excellence helps sure. But it's not the whole story at all.

Edited by corpsband
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not obnoxious. The poster's definition comprised only a small subset of the caption.

well considering they comprise approx 1/3 of the performers moving on the field, it makes a lot of sense to include their efforts in the caption!

visual proficiency is evaluated in both

Content:

  • depth of form body equipment responsibiities
  • simultaneous responsibiliites
  • use of expressive components
  • changes in meter, pulse, tempo

Achievement

  • demonstration of training
  • demonstration of expressive qualities
  • clarity, timing, articulation of body, form, equipment
  • precision with respect to challenge
  • overall environmental challenges
  • concentration, stamina, and recovery

Considering that the guard didn't actually have their own scores until later in DCI's existence, I think it's fair for corpsband to acknowledge the contribution of the guard as he has here. Now it seems that the guard is more than 1/3 of the contribution though, as they have their own caption and they are integrated into the other visual captions too. Interesting how things are balanced these days...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...